|
1
|
which was called the school fund. That is reflected
|
|
2
|
in our statutory provisions, but under modern budgets,
|
|
5
|
there is a general fund for which appropriations are
|
|
4
|
made and there are not two tax rates and there is not
|
|
5
|
a general fund and a school fund working in conjunction
|
|
6
|
They are still all one general fund.
|
|
7
|
So, the use of the words school fund is now
|
|
8
|
an anachronism.
|
|
9
|
MRS. BOTHE; That was our statement.
|
|
10
|
MR. PERKINS: That was ny statement, and if
|
|
11
|
you want to retain this, it has to be revised.
|
|
12
|
DR. SENSENBAUGH; I think the intent is
|
|
13
|
good.
|
|
14
|
MRS. FREEDLANDER; Mr. Chairman, if you say
|
|
15
|
all other departments are protected by statute, then
|
|
16
|
why couldn't the school be protected? If you can't
|
|
17
|
take reversions and play hanky-panky with them for all
|
|
18
|
departments, why --
|
|
19
|
MR. CASE: That is the question, Mrs.
|
|
20
|
Freedlander. I don't Know. Maybe t-.hey ought to take -
|
|
21
|
as Mrs. Bothe's committee suggested, scrap this whole
|
