|
1
|
fact.
|
|
2
|
MR. CASE: They never asked for a ruling
|
|
3
|
because they never had to.
|
|
4
|
MR. ENEY: That may be, but the fact is they
|
|
5
|
never considered it as such, whatever effect it might
|
|
6
|
have .
|
|
7
|
MR. CASE: That doesn't have too much effect
|
|
8
|
to me because what these gentlemen are saying is that
|
|
9
|
they think there ought -- don't let me put words in
|
|
10
|
your mouth, but Dr. Sensenbaugh, let me ask you this.
|
|
11
|
Do you think the Constitution ought to contain a pro-
|
|
12
|
vision which would prevent the legislature froia switch-
|
|
13
|
ing funds out of the education and into other areas,
|
|
14
|
assuming a reversion was going to take place?
|
|
15
|
DR. SENSENBAUGH: I'm not so sure it wouldn't
|
|
16
|
be a good protection for all departments, that you
|
|
17
|
couldn't have this interplay, because I could conceive
|
|
18
|
that somebody wants to build up an area somewhere and
|
|
19
|
they go in and they tap other departments in order to
|
|
20
|
make --
|
|
21
|
MR. HOFF: There's a lot of room for
|
