|
1
|
couldn't use it for anything other than education in
|
|
2
|
the next year or any other year, because the consti-
|
|
3
|
tutional provision is not limited to one year, you see.
|
|
4
|
MR. CASE: But you could always make a
|
|
5
|
bookkeeping entry, because they always need more. So,
|
|
6
|
it goes back and keeps revolving in the educational
|
|
7
|
system. There is no problem with that.
|
|
8
|
MR. ENEY: I don't think so, because if you
|
|
9
|
go on the premise that school funds, as used here, and
|
|
10
|
this I thought was a very plausible argument, meant
|
|
11
|
the appropriated funds, then you necessarily would have
|
|
12
|
to have the Budget Bureau every year pick up the re-
|
|
13
|
versions and include them in as income for the school
|
|
14
|
fund in the next year.
|
|
15
|
MR. CASE: They could do it.
|
|
16
|
MR. ENEY: They have never done it.
|
|
17
|
MR. CASE: They may not have done it. They
|
|
18
|
haven't done a lot of things, but they have done it in
|
|
19
|
MR. ENEY: Whether they are right or wrong
|
|
20
|
is something else, but, in fact, they have never re-
|
|
21
|
garded Section 3 as being applicable, as a matter of
|
