1
|
question a little differently and see if this is it.
|
2
|
Is it not true that the Budget Bureau has never re-
|
3
|
garded the budget appropriations for educational pur-
|
4
|
poses as a school fund within the meaning of Section 3
|
5
|
of Article 8?
|
6
|
MR. PF.RKINS: That is what I just said. I
|
7
|
don't think it is a school fund.
|
8
|
MR. ENEY: And they are diverted to other
|
9
|
purposes, whenever you use the diversion for another
|
10
|
purpose?
|
11
|
MR. PERKINS: Right.
|
12
|
MR. CASE: But only in the next budget, Kr.
|
13
|
Eney.
|
14
|
MR. ENEY: Yes, that's true, but it is not
|
15
|
an inviolate school fund.
|
16
|
MR. CASE: Then it goes back into the
|
17
|
general fund and it is no longer a school fund.
|
18
|
MR. ENEY: That is just the point. It
|
19
|
doesn't remain inviolate as a school fund.
|
20
|
MR. CASE: Of course, it couldn't remain
|
21
|
that way forever, but the point of it is that during
|