|
1
|
University of Maryland could go to Welfare and so on.
|
|
2
|
Now, I submit that this is not possible with respect
|
|
3
|
to education funds because the Constitution says that
|
|
4
|
the fund shall be inviolate, and I do not see how the
|
|
5
|
legislature could pass a law which would say that this
|
|
6
|
revorter could be spun around into other areas of the
|
|
7
|
State government.
|
|
8
|
Is this the way you understand it, Dr.
|
|
9
|
Sensenbaugh?
|
|
10
|
DR. SENSENBAUGH: Yes, sir, exactly.
|
|
11
|
MRS. BOTHE: And that derives from Section 3
|
|
12
|
of Article 8?
|
|
13
|
MR. CASE: From Section 3 of Article 8.
|
|
14
|
MRS. BOTHE: Because our Committee —
|
|
15
|
MR. CASE: The one you wanted to repeal.
|
|
16
|
MRS. BOTHE: Our Committee, after some
|
|
17
|
research, has been under the impression that the school
|
|
18
|
fund referred to there is nonexistent, except for some
|
|
19
|
escheats and nominal amounts that are considered to be
|
|
20
|
the school fund.
|
|
21
|
Apparently, in a number of states there is
|
