|
1
|
trying to protect, and give these local school systems
|
|
2
|
some assurance that this is something firm they can
|
|
3
|
count on. Then if the aid changes from year to year,
|
|
4
|
just like this booklet you have, and it night have
|
|
5
|
changed this last section and it could change again.
|
|
6
|
MR. CASE: 1 think it was pretty well devel-
|
|
7
|
oped at our last hearing that the provision really
|
|
8
|
protects you for one year. That is essentially what
|
|
9
|
it does.
|
|
10
|
DR. SENSENBAUGK: Yes.
|
|
11
|
MR. ENEY: Mr. Case, nay I ask a question
|
|
12
|
of you, because I haven't read the entire transcript
|
|
13
|
of the previous hearing and I ao not sure what is
|
|
14
|
behind your question, but are you suggesting that this
|
|
15
|
language of the Constitution be limited to something
|
|
16
|
that is essentially the present system of State aid?
|
|
17
|
MR. CASE: You see, Mr. Eney, there are
|
|
18
|
many facets of the State Education Department's budget
|
|
19
|
which does not as a matter of fact come under this,
|
|
20
|
and the people of the State Department are not sug-
|
|
21
|
gesting it should. This has resulted from a long
|
