1
|
DR. SENSENBAUGH: We can't afford to esti-
|
2
|
mate a little low.
|
3
|
MR. SMITH: So, you have to estimate it a
|
4
|
little high?
|
5
|
DR. SEHSENBAUGH: We have to be on the
|
6
|
cautious side. That is why you have a reversion.
|
7
|
MR. SMITH: But it still reverts.
|
8
|
DR. SENSENBAUGH: But it's the State's
|
9
|
money.
|
10
|
MR. ENEY: Is there actually a reverse situ-
|
11
|
ation? Has there been in the past ten years?
|
12
|
DR. SENSENBAUGH: Oh, yes.
|
13
|
MR. SARTORIUS: That has been primarily due
|
14
|
to assessable bases rather than pupils.
|
15
|
MR. HOFF: There hasn't been any year when
|
16
|
there hasn't been a sizable reversion.
|
17
|
DR. SENSENBAUGH: For a while, yes.
|
18
|
DR. EARHART: You have a number of variables
|
19
|
involved in this formula. You mentioned one a while
|
20
|
ago, Mr. Chairman, in the terms of net ordinary income
|
21
|
amount, which is a measure as well in this formula and,
|