|
1
|
which are not exactly germane.
|
|
2
|
So, at the outset, it will be seen that Dr.
|
|
3
|
Sensenbaugh stated for the record that the figures can
|
|
4
|
be refined by the Budget Bureau. Now, what figures
|
|
5
|
were we talking about at that particular time were the
|
|
6
|
input of pupil population into the .formula, because
|
|
7
|
that is really the only figure which can be refined,
|
|
8
|
as I understand it. The assessable basis is taken from
|
|
9
|
the last year's basis; hence, it is fixed. Income is
|
|
10
|
taken from two years past; hence, it is fixed.
|
|
11
|
Of course, the 1.228 is fixed, so that the
|
|
12
|
only thing that is a variable in this whole equation
|
|
13
|
is the pupil projection, and it was those figures that
|
|
14
|
Dr. Sensenbaugh had in mind.
|
|
15
|
Now, again, beginning at Page 201 of the
|
|
16
|
transcript, down in the middle of the page, at Line 9,
|
|
17
|
the Committee will see Dr. Sensenbaugh said, and I
|
|
18
|
am quoting:
|
|
19
|
"That's right. It's $340 times the amount
|
|
20
|
of pupils, that's the whole thing, and 1.228 on the
|
|
21
|
tax rate."
|