|
107
|
1
|
government, from the work he has done on it. I think,
|
2
|
true, we might not be able to get them into a Committee
|
3
|
meeting, whereas they would be available if we'd get
|
4
|
these matters before the Commission as a whole.
|
5
|
MR. BROOKS: It serves a dual purpose. You
|
6
|
let the Commission know where we are going and get their
|
7
|
reaction. At the same time, I don't think you will get
|
8
|
the Commission taking a vote or any action on this at the
|
9
|
next meeting. Even at the next meeting, I think they
|
10
|
will be unable to handle the matter, even if a formal
|
11
|
question is posed.
|
12
|
THE CHAIRMAN: And they will be bouncing it
|
13
|
back to us.
|
14
|
MR. BROOKS: And I don't think, if they should
|
15
|
make a decision, it would be any more than a tentative
|
16
|
decision such as has been made on the convention pro-
|
17
|
cedure reports.
|
18
|
MR. MELVIN: John, do you feel then we should
|
19
|
submit these detailed questions just like this to the
|
20
|
Commission?
|
21
|
MR. BROOKS: I think we will boil down the
|