clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings of the Senate, 1892
Volume 400, Page 593   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

1892. ] OF THE SENATE. 593

Senate bill entitled an Act to prevent the adultera-
tion and to regulate the sale of milk.

Which was adopted.

Mr. Coffin, from a minority of the Committee on
Elections, submitted the following report in the con-
tested election case of Bird vs. Talbott:
MINORITY REPORT.
To the Senate of Maryland;

As a member of the Committe on Elections of the
Senate, to which were referred the memorial and
papers embodying the contested election case of
Samuel R. Bird against Joseph F. Talbott, who was
declared elected by the Governor, and became until
his recent death, the sitting member from Calvert
county. I am unable to concur in the opinions ex-
pressed by a majority of said Committee, and there-
fore beg leave to respectfully submit this statement
of my conclusions, in the shape of a minority report.

1st. As to the facts in this case there is little or no
controversy and they seem, with one or two immater-
ial exceptions, to be correctly stated in the report of
the Committee. The conclusions arising from these
facts, however, leave room for great differences of
opinion.

With some of the conclusions of the Committee
upon the admitted facts I am unable to agree, and
especially with the insidious suggestion contained in
the following portion of their report, viz:

"The Committee find from the evidence that the
Democratic Supervisor of Elections did deliver the
official ballots in proper sealed packages to the Re-
publican Sheriff of the county, and said sheriff on the
morning of the election did deliver to the Judges of
Election of the Second Precinct what purported to be
the official ballots for said precinct, but on being
opened by said Judges was found not to be ballots,
but the local laws for the county. The proof does
not show how these local laws were substituted for
official ballots after the latter reached the sheriff's
hands. "

In this is contained the assumption and covert
charge, that whatever fraud there was in the said
38

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings of the Senate, 1892
Volume 400, Page 593   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives