|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1892.] OF THE HOUSE OF DELEGATES. 1150
Mr. Wilkinson moved the previous question.
The question being shall the main question be now
put ?
It was decided in the affirmative.
The question then being upon the adoption of the
message,
It was decided in the affirmative by yeas and nays,
as follows :
AFFIRMATIVE—Messrs. Speaker, Combs, Garner.
Brashears, Donaldson, Hutching Sappington, of Anne
Arundel, Ireland, Lane, Elliott, Schlaffer, Wooters,
Leonard, Green, Bowie, of Prince George's, Hill,
Godwin, McSherry, Gaver, Grove, of Frederick, Sap-
pington, of Frederick, Bevard, Thompson, Brennan,
Fox, Carter, Field, Bowie, of Baltimore city, O'Conor,
Gallagher, Gill, Sanders, Frincke, Carr, Cornthwaite,
Joyce, Smith, of Washington, Fockler, Shafer, Bar-
ber, Berret, Leeds—42.
NEGATIVE.—Messrs. Carrico, Maddox, Orrick, Cole,
Hamilton, Jr., Collins, Anderson, Sterling, Mere-
dith, Miles, Kirk, Grove, of Cecil, Perrie, Bryan,
Wallen, Franklin, Wilkinson, Hayman, Johnson,
Sams, Garrett, Laird, Griffith, Canby, Young, Hos-
ken, Sr., Haines, Tracey, Haslup, Ellegood, Laws,
Moore, Bittinger—33.
So the message of non concurrence was adopted.
Said message, together with bill, was sent to the
Senate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ORDER OF THE DAY.
The House considered the Order of the Day, being
House bill entitled an Act to add new sections to
Article 23, of the Code of Public General "Laws, title
"Corporations," sub-title "Telegraph Companies," to
come in after section 232, and to be designated "Sec-
tions 232 A, 232 B, 232 C, 232 D and 232 E," to regu-
late the rental and use of telephones in the cities,
towns and villages in the State of Maryland.
Mr. Sams submitted the following proposed amend-
ment :
AMENDMENT PROPOSED.
In section A, strike out all after the word "com-
munication," in line 7, (printed bill), to and including
the word "month," in line 12, and insert in place
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
