Thirty-first day of March, 1890.
|
No. 1.
|
|
|
|
WHEREAS, legal proceedings have been instituted in the Supreme
|
|
|
|
court of the District of Columbia and also in Washington
|
|
|
|
county by the trustees of the holders of the preferred construc-
|
|
|
|
tion bonds of the Chesapeake and Ohio canal company, issued
|
|
|
|
under the act of eighteen hundred and forty-four, chapter two
|
|
|
|
hundred and eighty-one, against the said Chesapeake and Ohio
|
Preamble .
|
|
|
canal company, and against the trustees of the holders of the
|
|
|
|
repair bonds of Said canal company, issued under the act of
|
|
|
|
eighteen hundred and seventy-eight, chapter fifty-eight, for the
|
|
|
|
purpose of obtaining possession of said canal and its works,
|
|
|
|
and for operating the same under the management of a receiver
|
|
|
|
appointed by said courts; and
|
|
|
|
WHEREAS, it is understood that the trustees of said last mentioned
|
|
|
|
repair bonds contemplate taking similar proceedings looking to
|
Preamble.
|
|
|
a like result; and
|
|
|
|
WHEREAS, in the controversy to which these proceedings will
|
|
|
|
give rise between these two classes of bondholders as to their
|
|
|
|
respective rights and privities, delays will occur which will be
prejudicial to the large interests held by this State in said
|
Preamble.
|
|
|
canal as mortgagee, creditor and stockholder; and if the views
|
|
|
|
of said bondholders shall prevail, large additional outlays will
|
|
|
|
be necessary to be made upon said canal, which will still
|
|
|
|
further postpone the liens of this State upon the same; and
|
|
|
|
WHEREAS, for the last twelve years the said canal has been main-
|
|
|
|
tained and operated at an average annual deficiency of fifty-six
|
Preamble
|
|
|
thousand dollars; and it is now apparent that in its present
|
|
|
|
deplorable condition, its restoration as a waterway capable of
|
|
|