CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES. ' 47

v Baker, 172 U. S. 269. Scranton v. Wheeler, 179 U S 141. McDonald v
Massachusetts, 180 U S. 311 French v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co , 181
U. S 324. Wright v. Davidson, 181 U. S. 371. Tonawanda v Lyon, 181 U.
S 389 Webstei v Fargo, 181 U S 394. Cass. Farm Co. v. Detroit, 181
U S 396. Detroit v. Parker, 181 U. S. 399. Shumate v Heman, 181 U S
402. Red River Valley Bank, v. Craig, 181 U. S. 548. Capital City Dairy
Co v. Ohio, 183 U S 238. Florida Central Ry. Co. v Reynolds, 183 U. S
471. Hanover Nat Bank v. Moyses, 186 U S 181 Dryer v Illinois, 187
U. S. 71. Mobile Trans. Co. v. Mobile, 187 U. S. 479. United States v.
Lynch, 188 U S 445 Williams v. Parker, 188 U. S. 491. Hawaii v. Man-
kichi, 190 U S 197. Howard v. Fleming- Howard v. N. C., 191 U S 126
Stanislaus Co v. San Joaqum C. & I Co., 192 U. S. 201. Bedford v. United
States, 192 U. S 217. Adams v. New York, 192 U. S. 585.

ARTICLE VI.

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right
to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State
and district wherein the crime shall have been committed,
which district shall have been previously ascertained by law,
and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation,
to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have com-
pulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to
have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.

United States v. Cooledge, 1 Wh. 415. Ex parte Kearney, 7 Wh. 38.
United States v. Mills, 7 Pet. 142. Barron v. City of Baltimore, 7 Pet 243
Fox v. Ohio, 5 How. 410. Withers v. Buckley et al., 20 How. 84. Ex parte
Milligan, 4 Wall 2 Twitchell v The Commonwealth, 7 Wall 321 Miller
v. The United States, 11 Wall 268. United States v Cook, 17 Wall. 168.
United States v. Cruikshank et al., 92 U. S 542. Spies v. Illinois 123 U S
131. Ellenbecker v. Plymouth Co., 134 U. S. 31. Jones v. U. S., 137 U. S.
202 Cook v. U S , 138 U S 157. In re Ross, 140 U. S. 453. Hallinger v.
Davis, 146 U. S 314. Mattox v. U. S., 156 U S. 237. Bergemann v. Becker,
157 U S 655 Rosen v. U S., 161 U S 29 United States v Zucker, 161
U S 475 Wong Wing v. U. S., 163 U. S. 228. Motes v. U. S , 178 U. S.
458 McDonald v Massachusetts, 180 U S 311. Hawan v Mankichi, 190
U. S. 197.

ARTICLE VII.

In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall
exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be pre-
served, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-
examined in any Court of the United States, than according to
the rules of the common law.

United States v. La Vengeance, 3 Dall. 297. Bank of Columbia v Oakley,
4 Wh. 235 Parsons v. Bedfoid et al.. 3 Pet 333. Lessee of Livingston v.
Moore et al , 7 Pet 469. Webster v Reid, 11 How. 437 State of Pennsyl-
vania v The Wheeling, &c. Bridge Company et al., 13 How 518 The Jus-