444 CHANCERY. [ART. 16

cretion, may order a sale of the property before final decree,
if satisfied clearly by proof that, at the final hearing of the
case, a sale will be ordered, and order the money arising from
such sale to be deposited or invested, to be disposed of as the
court shall direct by the final decree.

Dorsey's Lessee v. Garey, 30 Md. 489. Dorsey v. Dorsey, 30 Md. 522.
Dorsey v. Dorsey, 37 Md. 64. Cornell v. McCann, 37 Md. 89. Washington
City and Pt Lookout R. R. v S. Md. R R. Co., 55 Md. 153. Donohue v.
Daniel, 58 Md. 595. Kelly v. Gilbert, 78 Md. 431

1888, art. 16, sec. 193. 1860, art. 16, sec. 130 1835, ch. 380, sec. 2.

208. The court may decree a sale to enforce a vendor's lien
upon any estate in lands, whether legal or equitable, or may
decree a sale to enforce any other equitable lien thereon,
although the complainant may have a perfect remedy at law
for the money for which the lien is claimed.

McMechin v. Maggs, 4 H. & J. 134. Lansdale v. Ghequiere, 4 H. & J. 260.
Williams v. Mayor, etc., 6 H. & J. 529. Hall v. Maccubbin, 6 G. & J. 107.
Pratt v. Van Wyck's Exr., 6 G. & J. 495. Wright v. Woodland, 10 G. & J.
387. Green v. Fowler, 11 G. & J. 103. Magruder v. Peter, 11 G. & J. 217.
Lee v. Admr. of Boteler, 12 G. & 3. 326. Richardson v. Sti'llmger, 12 G. &
J. 477. Langan v. Henderson, 1 Bl 236. Moreton v. Harrison, 1 Bl. 491.
Ridgeway v. Toram, 2 Md Ch. 303 Stull v. Hurtt, 9 Gill, 440. Eyler v.
Crabbs, 2 Md. 137 Elysville Mfg. Co. v. Okisko Co., 5 Md. 152. Dorsey v.
Hobbs, 10 Md. 412. Carr v. Hobbs, 11 Md. 285. Gayle v. Fattle, 14 Md 69.
Bratt v. Bratt's Admr., 21 Md. 578. B. & O. R. R. Co. v. Trimble, 51 Md. 101.

Ibid. sec. 194. 1860, art. 16, sec. 131. 1841, ch. 216.

209. The court shall have full power and authority, on
application by bill or petition of the trustee appointed by said
court to sell real estate, to compel the purchaser thereof to
comply with all or any of the terms of such sale, by process
of attachment or other execution suited to the case; or the
said court, upon such application, may direct the property
purchased to be re-sold, at the risk of such purchaser, upon
such terms as the court may direct; and in such case, if the
proceeds of the re-sale, after payment of the expenses thereof
and of all costs of proceeding, shall not be equal to the pay-
ment of the purchase money originally bid therefor, the court
may order and direct the difference to be paid by the said
purchaser, and enforce such order by execution.

Sungstack's Exr. v. Harding, 4 H. & J. 186. Smith v. Baldwin, 4 H. & J.
331 Davis v. Simpson, 5 H. & J. 147. Anderson v. Foulke, 2 H. & G. 346.
Richardson v. Jones, 3 G. & J. 163. Brown v. Wallace, 4 G. & J. 479.