ART. 5] APPEALS FROM ORPHANS' COURTS. 239

1888, art. 5, sec. 57. 1860, art 5, sec 38. 1826, ch. 200, sec. 11

59. The bond, which any appellant, who may die pending
any appeal or writ of error, shall have executed for the prose-
cuting an appeal, or suing forth a writ of error, and the securi-
ties therein, shall be liable and answerable to the appellee, his
executors, administrators or assigns, for the due prosecution of
the said appeal or writ of error.

Appeals from Orphans' Courts.

1888, art. 5, sec. 58. 1860, art. 5. sec. 39. 1818, ch 204, sec. 1.

60. From all decrees, orders, decisions and judgments, made
by the orphans' court, the party, who may deem himself
aggrieved by such decree, order, decision or judgment, may
appeal to the court of appeals.

Barroll v Reading, 5 H. & J. 175. Sewell v. Sewell's Admr., 1 H. & G 9
Raborg v. Hammond, 2 H. & G 52. Wilson v Wilson, 3 G. & J. 20 Nes-
bitt v Dallam, 7 G & J. 494. Stevenson v. Shriver, 9 G & J. 324. Mayhew
v Soper, 10 G & J. 366 Offut v. Gott, 12 G & J. 385. Compton v Comp-
ton, 2 Gill, 241. Compton v Barnes, 4 Gill, 57 Hebb v. Hebb, 5 Gill, 509
Pegg v Warlord, 4 Md. 385 Warford v. Van Sickle, 4 Md 397. Ex parte
Shipley, 4 Md 493 Parker B. Gwynn, 4 Md. 426 Plater v Groome, 5 Md.
96 Trail v Snouffer, 6 Md. 315. Falconer v Regelier, 6 Md. 552. Hoffar
v. Stonestreet, 6 Md 303. Watkins v. Bevans, 6 Md 489. Lefevre v.
Lefevre, 6 Md. 472. Smith v Smith's Admr , 7 Md. 55. Dorsey v. Warfield,
7 Md. 65. Lammott v. Maulsby, 8 Md. 5 Dorsey v. Dorsey, 10 Md. 471
Johnson v. Brannaman, 10 Md. 495 Edelen v Edelen, 11 Md. 416. Porter's
Exr v Timanus, 12 Md. 283 Hesson v Hesson, 14 Md. 8. Cecil v. Harring-
ton, 18 Md 512 Cecil v. Cecil, 19 Md. 72 Crawford v. Blackburn, 19 Md
41. Gephart v Strong, 20 Md 522. Price v Taylor, 21 Md 357. Gunther
v. State, 31 Md. 21. Redman v. Chance, 32 Md. 42 Magraw v Munnik-
huysen, 35 Md. 291. Dennison v Dennison, 35 Md 361 Worthington v
Herron, 39 Md 145. Abbott v. Golibart, 39 Md 554 Jones v. Jones, 41 Md
354 Woods v. Matchett, 47 Md. 390. Covoy v. Charles, 49 Md. 314. Bantz
v. Bantz, 52 Md 686 Stnte v. Reiff, 55 Md 92. Nally v. Long, 56 Md 567.
Johns v. Caldwell, 60 Md. 259. Forney v Shriner, 60 Md. 419. Hignutt v.
Cranor, 62 Md. 216. Brown v. Johns, 62 Md. 333. McGill v. McAvoy, 85
Md 291 Meyer v Henderson, 88 Md 590

Ibid sec. 59 1860, art 5, sec. 40. 1798, ch. 101, sub-ch. 15, sec. 18.

61. If the decree, order, decision or judgment shall have
been given or made on a summary proceeding, and on the testi-
mony of witnesses, the party shall not be allowed to appeal,
unless he shall immediately notify his intention and request that
the testimony be reduced to writing, and in such case the