clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
The Maryland Code Public General Laws, 1904
Volume 393, Page 238   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

238 APPEALS AND ERRORS. [ART. 5

1888, art. 5, sec. 53 1860, art. 5, sec. 33. 1840, ch. 232. 1861, ch. 17.
1862, ch.. 249. 1864, ch. 268.

55. The filing of an appeal bond approved as aforesaid and
of said affidavit shall stay any execution which has been issued
on any such judgment or decree, whether the same has been in
part executed or not; and the sheriff or other officer in whose
hands the execution may be, upon the exhibition to him of sat-
isfactory evidence that an appeal bond has been filed. and
approved, and that said affidavit has been filed, and upon the
receipt of the costs which have accrued on said execution, shall
stay all further proceedings, and deliver up the property; pro-
vided, that this section shall not extend to appeals from courts
of common law rendered by confession, or to any judgment ren-
dered on verdict, unless a bill of exceptions has been taken, or
a motion in arrest of judgment has been overruled.

Dyer's Exrs v Beatty, 3 H & McH. 219. Slusser v Chapline, 4 H. &
McH 222 Blacklock v. Maddox, 4 H. & McH., 222. State v Page, 1 H &
J. 475. Whetcroft's Admrs v. Dorsey's Exrs., 1 H. & J 482. Johnson v.
Goldsborough, 1 H. & J. 499 Beatty v. Chaplme, 2 H. & J. 7. Fullerton
v Miller, 22 Md. 1. Black v. Carroll, 24 Md. 251. Eakle v. Smith, 24 Md
339 Kirkland v Krebs, 34 Md 93.

Ibid, sec 54 1860, art 5, sec. 34. 1826, ch. 200, sec. 15.

56. The courts of law and equity and the judges thereof, in
vacation, shall have full power and authority to examine into
and determine on the sufficiency of the sureties to any bond
filed in the offices of the said courts, respectively, under this
article, and the said courts may from time to time make such
rules and orders for the justifying or proving the sufficiency of
such sureties, and for requiring additional security in any case,
as they may deem proper.
Barnum v. Raborg, 2 Md. Ch 516. Ringgold's Case, 1 Bl 5.

Ibid sec 55 1860, art 5, sec. 34 1826, ch 200, see 16

57. In case any such bond shall be rejected, the court or
judge rejecting the same shall have a discretionary power to
grant further time to the party to file another bond; and if upon
indulgence the party shall file a new bond which shall be
approved, the supersedeas thereupon granted shall have relation
back to the day 'of the filing of the first bond.

Ibid sec. 56 1860, art 5, sec. 36 1826, ch 200, sec 17.

58. No bond required by this article to be executed for the
purpose of staying or delaying execution upon any judgment
or decree which shall be approved shall be avoided for any
matter of form.


 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
The Maryland Code Public General Laws, 1904
Volume 393, Page 238   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives