clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
The Maryland Code Public General Laws, 1904
Volume 393, Page 223   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

ART. 5] APPEALS FROM COURTS OF LAW. 223

amount laid in the declaration; but the plaintiff below, or his
legal representative, may amend the record by entering a
release of the excess above the sum laid in the declaration.

Harris v. Jain-ay, 3 H. & J. 543. Marburg v. Marburg, 26 Md. 8. Frank
v. Morrison, 55 Md. 399. Attrill v. Patterson, 58 Md. 260. Harvey v. B. &
O. R. R. Co., 70 Md. 318.

1888, art. 5, sec. 18. 1860, art. 29, sec. 4. 1811, ch. 161, sec. 4.

20. If any entry or amendments which the court of appeals
may permit would require an alteration of the judgment from
which the appeal is taken, the court may, on deciding the
appeal, give such judgment as the entry or amendment may
require.

Armstrong v. M. & C. C. of Hagerstown, 32 Md. 54 Frank v. Morrison,
65 Md. 399.

Ibid. sec. 19. 1860, art. 5, sec. 15. 1790, ch. 42, sec. 1.

21. If an appeal shall be taken, or writ of error sued out,
for several exceptions, the court of appeals shall give judgment
on every exception; if a new trial is to be awarded.

Winter v. Donovan, 8 Gill, 376. Owings v. Emery, 3 Md. 190. Boehme
v. Carr, 3 Md. 210 Harris v. Regester, 70 Md 122. Roberts v Roberts,
71, Md. 8.

Ibid. sec. 20. 1860, art. 5. sec. 16. 1790, ch. 42, sec. 1. 1826, ch. 200, sec. 10.
1830, ch. 186, sec 1. 1849, ch. 88, sec 1. Rule 8.

22. In all cases where judgments shall be reversed or
affirmed by the court of appeals, and it shall appear to the
court that a new trial ought to be had, such new trial shall be
awarded, and a certified copy of the opinion and judgment of
the court of appeals shall be transmitted forthwith to the court
from which the appeal was taken, to the end that said cause
may be again tried as if it had never been tried; and no writ
of procedendo, with transcript of record, shall be transmitted,
as heretofore practised.

Earnshaw v. Sun Mutual Aid Society, 68 Md. 477. Archer v. State, 74 Md.
410. Lucke v. Clothing Asso. 77 Md. 411. State v. Balto. & L. R. R., 77
Md. 493. Creager v. Hooper, 83 Md. 504. Wiley v. Heaps, 89 Md. 47.

Ibid. sec. 21. 1860, art 5, sec. 17. 1819, ch. 149

23. When, on the reversal of a judgment, a new trial shall
be awarded, the court of appeals, upon suggestion in writing by
either of the parties, supported by affidavits or other proper
evidence that a fair and impartial trial cannot be had in the


 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
The Maryland Code Public General Laws, 1904
Volume 393, Page 223   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives