clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
The Maryland Code Public General Laws, 1904
Volume 393, Page 222   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

222 APPEALS AND ERRORS. [ART. 5

1888, art. 5, sec. 14. I860, art. 5, sec. 14. 1800, ch. 69.

15. On reversing any judgment, or part of a judgment, at
law, the court of appeals shall have power to give such judg-
ment as ought to have been given by the court below, and may
in all cases enforce their judgment by execution.

McCormick v. Deaver, 22 Md 187. Howard's Lessee v Carpenter, 22 Md
249. McDonald v. State, 45 Md 90. Frank v. Morrison, 55 Md. 399..

1900, ch 367, sec. 14 A.

16. On reversing any judgment or part of a judgment at
law where the case is remanded for a new trial the parties may,
by agreement in writing, submit the said case to the court of
appeals for final adjudication and judgment upon the fact set
forth in the record, and upon such submission the court of
appeals shall have power to pass upon all questions of fact and
of law arising in the said case, and to give final judgment
therein, and to enforce said judgment by execution.

1888, art. 5, sec. 15. 1860, art. 29, sec. 37. 1809, ch. 153, sec. 2.

17. If the court shall be of opinion that there appears to be
sufficient matter of substance on any appeal or writ of error,
to enable them to proceed thereon, the same shall not be
reversed or dismissed for want of form; and the court may
permit any entry to be made by either party during the pen-
dency of the appeal, which might have been made by such party
after verdict in the court below; nor shall any judgment or
verdict be reversed, if there be one good count in the declara-
tion.

Grant v. Ridsdale, 2 H. & J. 186. Wood v. Grundy, 3 H. & J. 13 Noland
v. Ringgold, 3 H. & J. 216 Wilson v. Mitchell, 3 H. & J. 91. Ridgely v.
Riggs, 4 H. & J. 367. Raborg v. Bank of Columbia, 1 H. & G. 231. Kent
v Lyles, 7 G. & J. 73 State v. Turner, 8 G. & 3. 125. State v. Harrison,
9 G. & J. 15. Gurley v. Lee, 11 G. & J. 395. Gordon v. Downey, 1 Gill, 41.
Smith v. Morgan, 8 Gill, 138 Williams v. Bramble, 2 Md. 313 Terry v
Bright, 4 Md 430. Parrish v State, 14 Md. 245 Avirett v State, 76 Md
531. Gunther v. Dranbauer, 86 Md. 9.

Ibid sec 16 1860, art. 29, sec. 38 1809, ch. 153, sec. 2

18. All writs of error wherein there shall be any variance
from the original record, or other defect may be amended and
made agreeable to such record.

Ibid. sec. 17. 1860, art. 29, sec. 39 1811, ch. 161, sec. 3.

19. No judgment shall be reversed in the court of appeals
because the verdict was rendered for a larger sum than the


 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
The Maryland Code Public General Laws, 1904
Volume 393, Page 222   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives