ART. 5] APPEALS FROM COURTS OF LAW—BILLS OF EXCEPTIONS. 219

Sanders, 8 Md. 118. Owings v. Jones, 9 Md 116. Kunkel v. Spooner, 9 Md.
462. Thistle v. Frostburg Co., 10 Md 148. Reynolds v Furlong, 10 Md
318. Atwell v Grant, 11 Md. 101. Richardson v. Milburn, 11 Md 346
Keller v State, 12 Md 328. Reynolds v. Negro Juliet, 14 Md. 120 Elliott
v. Knott. 14 Md. 121 Bridges v McKenna, 14 Md. 258. Billingsley v.
State, 14 Md. 374 B. & O. R. R. v. Resley, 14 Md. 424. Cover v. Stockdale,
16 Md 1. Chipman v Stansbury, 16 Md. 154. McTavish v. Carroll, 17 Md.
1 Ridgely v. Bond, 17 Md. 14. Scott v. Scott, 17 Md. 78. Hallowell v.
Miller, 17 Md. 305 Kent v Holliday, 17 Md 388. Walters v. Munroe, 17
Md 501 Yingling v. Kohlhass, 18 Md. 148. Fell's Point Savs. Bank v.
Weedon, 18 Md 328. Dorsey v. Harris, 22 Md. 85. Morrison v Hammond,
27 Md. 604. Everett v. State, 28 Md 191. Stansbury v. Keedy, 29 Md. 361.
Homer v O'Laughlin, 29 Md 470 Mayer v. Soyster, 30 Md. 403 Andrews
v. Poe, 30 Md. 485. White v. Salomonsky, 30 Md. 588. Mears v. Adreon, 31
Md. 234. Smith v. Wood, 31 Md. 301. Hamilton v. State, 32 Md 354.
Worthington v. Tormey, 34 Md. 182. Morns v Wrenschall, 34 Md. 492.
Gabelien v. Plaenker, 36 Md. 61. Strauss v. Young, 36 Md. 246. Schley v
Merritt, 37 Md. 352. Stansbury v Fogle, 37 Md. 369 A. & E. R R Co. v.
Gantt, 39 Md 115. Davis v. State, 39 Md. 355 Gent v. Ensor, 41 Md. 24.
B. & O. R. R. Co. v. Woodward, 41 Md. 268. Balto. Building Asso. v. Grant,
41 Md. 560. Newman v. McComas, 43 Md. 70. Scarlett v Academy of
Music, 43 Md. 203. Cockey v Ensor, 43 Md. 266. Third Nat. Bank v. Boyd,
44 Md. 47 Stillman v. Dougherty, 44 Md. 380 Grove v Schwartz, 45 Md.
227 Broll v. State, 45 Md. 356. McKnew v. Duvall, 45 Md. 501 Scarlett
v. Academy of Music, 46 Md. 153. Keene v. Van Reuth, 48 Md. 184. Frank-
lin v. Claflin, 49 Md. 24 Mondell v. Shafer, 49 Md. 492. Hearn v Gould,
51 Md. 321. Reier v. Strauss, 54 Md. 291 Eckenrode v. Chemical Co., 55
Md. 66. Coward v. Dillinger, 56 Md. 61. Ecker v. First Nat. Bank, 62 Md.
519. Dwyer v. State, 65 Md. 278. B. & O. R. R. Co v Mali, 66 Md 56.
McCullough v. Biedler, 66 Md. 283. Albert v. State, 66 Md. 334. Jackson
v. Commrs, of Salisbury, 66 Md. 460 Shipley v. Shilling, 66 Md. 565. Thorne
v. Fox, 67 Md. 74. Sentman v. Gamble, 69 Md. 305 South Baltimore Com-
pany v. Muhlbach, 69 Md. 396. Schaeffer v. Gilbert, 73 Md. 67 Bragunier
B Penn, 79 Md. 246. Cox v. Bryan, 81 Md. 290. Mitchell v. State, 82 Md.
531. Gunther v. Dranbauer, 86 Md. 9 Lewis v Tapman, 90 Md. 306
Worcester Co. v. Ryckman, 91 Md. 39 Moses v. Allen, 91 Md. 42. Muir v.
Beauchamp, 91 Md. 658-9. Balto. City v. Austin, 95 Md. 93. New Windsor
v Stocksdale, 95 Md. 214.

1688, art. 5, sec. 10 Rule 5

10. Bills of exceptions shall be so prepared as only to
present to the court of appeals the rulings of the court below
upon some matter of law, and shall contain- only such state-
ment of facts as may be necessary to explain the bearing of the
rulings upon the issues or questions involved; and if the facts
are undisputed, they shall be stated as facts, and the evidence
from which they are deduced shall not be set out; and if dis-