218 APPEALS AND ERRORS. [ART. 5

1888, art 6, sec. 9. 1860, art. 5, sec 12 1825, ch. 117, tec. 1. 1862, ch 154.

Rule 4.

9. In no case shall the court of appeals decide any point or
question which does not plainly appear by the record to have
been tried and decided by the court below; and no instruction
actually given shall be deemed to be defectively reason of
any assumption therein of any fact by the said court, or because
of a question of law having been thereby submitted to the jury,
unless it appear from the record that an objection thereto for
such defect, was taken at the trial; nor shall any question
arise in the court of appeals as to the insufficiency of evidence
to support any instruction actually granted, unless it appear
that such question was distinctly made to and decided by the
court below.

Mundell v. Perry, 2 G. & J. 193. Davis v. Leab, 2 G. & J. 302. Ayres v.
Kain, 3 Gr. & J. 24. Penn v. Flack, 3 G. & J. 369 Sothoron v. Weems, 3 G
& J. 435 Edelen v State, 4 G & J 277. Charlotte Hall School v. Green-
well, 4 G. & J. 407. Sasscer v Walker, 5 G. & J. 102. Graham v. Harris, 5
Or. & 3 489 Bruce v. Cook, 6 G. & J. 345. Boteler v. Brooke, 7 G.& J. 156.
Brice v. Randall, 7 6. & J. 349. Nesbitt v. Dallam, 7 G. & J. 494. Sasscer
v. Walker, 8 G & J. 110. State v. Turner, 8 G. & J. 133. Warfield v. David-
son, 6 G & J. 209. Penn , Del & Md. S. N Co. v. Dandridge, 8 G. & J. 248
Abell v. Harris, 11 G. & J. 367. Burgess v. State, 12 Gr. & J. 65. Gray v.
Cooke, 12 G. & J. 236 Gardner v. Hardy, 12 G. & J. 365. Doyle v. Commrs.
12 Gr. & J. 484. Mitchell v MitcheU, 1 Gill, 66 Wolf v. Hauver, 1 Gill, 84.
Keefer v. Mattingly, 1 Gill, 182. Leopard v. C. & O. Canal Co., 1 Gill, 222,
Boarman v. Israel, 1 Gill, 372 Hanson v State, 2 Gill, 42. Walter v. Alex-
ander, 2 Gill, 204. Phelan v. Crosby, 2 Gill, 462. Richardson v State, 2 GUI,
439. Bullitt v. Musgrave, 3 Gill, 31. Schleigh v. Hagerstown Bank, 4 Gill,
306 Parker v. Sedwick, 4 Gill, 318 Stockton v. Frye, 4 Gill, 406 Gardmer
v Miles, 5 Gill, 94. Hardy v. Coe, 5 Gill, 189. Western Bank v. Kyle, 6 Gill,
352. Carter v. Cross, 7 Gill, 46. Wheeler v. State, 7 Gill, 344. Tuck v.
Boone, 8 Gill, 187. Cushwa v. Cushwa, 9 Gill, 248. Marshall v. Haney, 9
Gill, 258 Newcomer v. Keedy, 9 Gill, 269. Cook v Duvall, 9 Gill, 461.
Milburn v State, 1 Md. 26 Graham v Sangston, 1 Md 65 Lawson v. Sny-
der, 1 Md. 77 Dorsey v. Dashiell, 1 Md 207 Middlekauff v. Smith, 1 Md
337 Bull v Schuberth, 2 Md. 38. Renwick v Williams, 2 Md. 356. Emory
v. Owings, 3 Md. 178. Morgan v. Briscoe, 4 Md. 271. Burtles v. State, 4 Md.
273. Mitchell v Smith, 4 Md. 404. Ellicott v. Peterson, 4 Md. 476.' Price
v. Thomas, 4 Md. 514. Cushwa v. Cushwa, 5 Md 44. Bridendolph v. Zeller,
5 Md 58. State v Williams, 5 Md. 82. Coates v. Sangston, 5 Md. 121.
Barker v. Ayres, 5 Md. 202 Stewart v. Spedden, 5 Md. 433. Tysqn v Shueey,
5 Md. 553 Manning v. Hayes, 6 Md. 5 Gittings v. Mayhew, 6 Md. 130.
Edelen v. Edelen, 6 Md. 288 Hatton v. McClish, 6 Md. 417. Johnson v.
George, 6 Md. 452. Cloud v. Needles, 6 Md. 501 Warner v. Hardy, 6 Md.
525. Lee v. Tinges, 7 Md. 215 Warner v. Fowler, 8 Md. 30 Edelen v-