ART. 93] ORPHANS' COURT. 2035

93 Md. 94. Jones, Admr. v. Harbaugh, 93 Md. 284. Cummings v. Robin-
son, 95 Md. 87.

1888, art. 93, sec. 240. 1860, art. 93, see. 240. 1831, ch. 315, sec 12

244. If, upon the answer to any petition or bill filed under
the provisions of the two preceding sections, either party shall
require it, the court shall cause an issue or issues to be made
up and sent to the circuit court for the county, or the superior
court of Baltimore city, the court of common pleas, or the
Baltimore city court, as the case may be, to be there tried and
disposed of as other issues from the orphans' court; and either
party to such bill or petition may appeal to the circuit court for
the county, or the superior court of Baltimore city.

Worthington v. Herron, 39 Md. 145 Abbott v. Golibart, 39 Md. 554.
Hignutt v. Cranor, 62 Md. 216. Gibson v. Cook, 62 Md. 256. Linthicum v.
Polk, 93 Md. 91 Cummings v. Robinson, 95 Md. 87.

Ibid. sec. 241. 1860, art. 93, sec. 241. 1816, ch. 203, sec. 4.

245. Whenever any joint administrator or executor shall
apprehend that he is likely to suffer by the negligence or mis-
conduct in the administration, improper use, or misapplication
of the assets of the estate by any executor or administrator,
he shall make complaint to the orphans' court, and if the same
shall be adjudged well founded, the court shall have authority,
in their discretion, to revoke the powers and authority of the
executor or administrator so complained of, and to enforce by
attachment and commitment, if necessary, the surrender and
delivery to the remaining executor or administrator of the
assets, and of all book accounts and evidences of debt of the
estate that may be in the possession or control of the person
so dismissed from the administration, and the remaining execu-
tors or administrators shall have remedy by an action on the
case for the recovery of any loss or damage they may be sub-
ject to or suffer by the executor or administrator whose powers
shall have been revoked as aforesaid.

Beall v. Hilliary, 1 Md. 197. Hesson v. Hesson, 14 Md. 8. Forney v. Shri-
ner, 60 Md. 419. Whiting v. Whiting, 64 Md. 157. Macgill v McEvoy, 85
Md 289. Linthicum v. Polk, 93 Md. 94. Yakel v. Yakel, 96 Md. 244.

Ibid. sec. 242. 1860, art 93, sec. 242. 1831, ch. 315, sec. 6.

246. Whenever the. orphans' court shall revoke letters testa-
mentary or of administration or of guardianship, it shall be
the duty of the party whose letters or guardianship may be
revoked forthwith to render to such court an account of his
administration or guardianship up to the period of the rendi-