ART. 75] PROCESS—WHERE TO BE ISSUED. 1695

appear, the court shall have an appearance entered for those
who fail to appear, and the same proceedings shall be pursued
as if all had appeared.

1888, art. 75, sec. 132. 1860, art. 75, sec. 87. 1801, ch 74, secs. 11,12.
1888, ch. 456. 1898, ch. 255.

144. No person shall be sued out of the county in which he
resides until the sheriff or coroner of the county in which he
resides shall have returned a non est on a summons issued in
such county; provided, that nothing herein contained shall
apply to any person who shall abscond from justice in the
county where he lives, hut such person may be sued in any
county where he may be found; and provided further, that any
person who resides in one county but carries on any regular
business, or habitually engages in any avocation or employment
in another county, may be sued in either county, whether before
a justice of the peace or in a court of law or equity; this section
not to apply to ejectment, dower, replevin, scire facias on judg-
ment or decree, nor to heirs, devisees or terre-tenants, against
whom process may be issued to another county.

Redgrave v. Jones, 1 H. & McH. 195. Hoffman v Prout, 4 H & McH. 165.
Deale v Estep, 3 Bl 433 Cape Sable Case, 3 Bl. 656 Beall v Brown, 7
Md. 393 Hamilton v. State, 32 Md. 348. Gittings v. State, 33 Md. 458.
State v. Gittings, 35 Md. 169. Yoe v. Gelston, 37 Md. 233. Tyler v. Mur-
ray, 57 Md. 435. Ireton v. M. & C. C. of Balto., 61 Md. 432. B. & Y. T.
Co. v. Crowther, 63 Md. 571. Chappell v. Lacey, 77 Md. 172. Henderson v.
Md. Home Ins. Co., 90 Md. 49. Gambiill v. Schooley, 95 Md,. 271. Crom-
well v. Willis & Homer, 96 Md 265.

Ibid, sec 133 1860, art 75, sec. 88. 1785, ch. 87, sec 4
1838, ch. 329.

145. If any trespass shall be committed on any real prop-
erty and the person committing the same shall remove from
the county where such property may lie, or cannot be found
in such county, such tresspasser may be sued in any county
where he may be found, and an executor may be sued either in
the county where he resides or where he obtained administra-
tion.

Patterson v. Wilson, 6 G. & J. 499. Crook v Pitcher, 61 Md 510. B. &
Y. T. Co. v. Crowther, 63 Md 571.

Ibid. sec. 134. 1860, art. 75, sec. 89. 1860, ch 29.

146. Any captain, master or owner of any steamboat or
other vessel may be sued for the non-delivery or injury of any
goods or chattels in the county where the goods or chattels are