ART. 75] EJECTMENT. 1671

to prove that the lands in controversy have been patented; but
a patent shall in all cases be presumed in favor of the party
showing a title otherwise good; and actual enclosure shall not
be necessary to prove possession, but acts of exclusive user
and ownership, other than enclosure, may be given in evidence
io the jury to prove possession.

Lloyd v. Gordon, 2 H & McH. 254. Cheney v. Ringgold, 2 H. & J. 87.
Hall v. Gittings, 2 H. & J. 112. Hammond v. Ridgely, 5 H. & J. 264. Casey
v. Inloes, 1 Gill, 500. Cresap's Lessee v. Hutson, 9 Gill, 269. Hoye v.
Swan's Lessee, 5 Md. 237. Armstrong v. Risteau, 5 Md. 256. Stump v.
Henry, 6 Md. 202. Warner v. Hardy, 6 Md. 525. Thistle v. Frostburg Coal
Co , 10 Md. 130. Ridgely v. Bond, 17 Md. 14. Van Bibber's Lessee v
Frazier, 17 Md. 436. Gittings v. Moale, 21 Md. 135. Morgan's Lessee v.
Slider, 22 Md. 267. Nutwell v. Tongue's Lessee, 22 Md. 419 Dean v.
Brown, 23 Md. 11. Davis v. Furlow, 27 Md. 536. Morrison v. Hammond's
Lessee, 27 Md. 604. Israel v. Israel, 30 Md. 125. Beatty's Lessee v. Mason,
30 Md 414 Newman v. Young's Lessee, 30 Md. 417. Baker v. Swan's
Lessee, 32 Md 358. Hammond v. Morrison's Lessee, 33 Md. 102. Camp-
bell's Lessee v. Fletcher, 37 Md. 430. Campbell v. Shipley, 41 Md. 81.
Hies v McCabe, 45 Md. 83.

1888, art. 76, sec 77. 1860, art. 75, sec. 53. 1852, ch. 177, sec. 3.

80. No warrant of resurvey shall issue in any action of
ejectment unless the court shall be satisfied that there is a dis-
pute about the location of the lands claimed in said action;
nor shall any issue in other actions unless there is a dispute
about the location of the lands for the injury of which damages
are claimed, or unless the court shall be satisfied that plats are
necessary for illustration.

Mitchell v. Mitchell, 2 Gill, 230. Ibid , 8 Gill, 98 Ibid., 1 Md. 44. Ibid.,
6 Md. 224 Newman v Young's Lessee, 30 Md 417. Parker v Wallis, 60
Md. 16. Walsh v McIntire, 68 Md. 421. Kelso v. Stigar, 75 Md. 394
Hackett v. Webster, 97 Md 411

Ibid. sec. 78. 1860, art. 75, sec. 54 1852, ch. 177, sec. 4.

81. In any action where the parties hold or claim under the
same title the lands in dispute, no warrant of resurvey shall
issue, except in cases where the parties claim different parcels
under the same title, and it appears to the court there is a dis-
pute about the location of the divisional line or lines.

Parker v. Wallis, 60 Md. 16.

Ibid. see. 79. 1860, art. 75, sec. 55. 1852. ch. 177, sec 5. 1872, ch. 346

82. Where a warrant of resurvey shall be issued in any
action of ejectment or other action, the party applying for