ART. 75] DEMURRER—ARREST OF JUDGMENT. 1633

1888, art. 75, sec. 6. 1860, art. 75, sec. 6. 1763, ch. 23.

1856, ch. 112, sec. 36.

6. No special demurrer shall be allowed in any civil case.
Blackburn v. Beall's Ex'r, 21 Md. 208. Spencer v. Trafford, 42 Md. 1
Gott v. State, 44 Md. 319. Ches. & Pot Tel. Co. v. Mackenzie, 74 Md. 44 .

Ibid. sec. 7 1860, art. 75, sec 7. 1856, ch 112, sec. 37.
7t No general demurrer shall be allowed for a mere informal
statement of a cause of action or defense; provided, such state-
ment is sufficient in substance.

Shoop v Powles, 13 Md 304 Kent v. Holliday, 17 Md 387. Blackburn v.
Beall's Ex'r, 21 Md. 208 Wilms v. White, 26 Md. 380. McAleer v. Horsey,
35 Md. 439. Miller v. Miller, 41 Md. 623. Spencer v. Trafford, 42 Md. 1
Mitchell v. McCleary, 42 Md. 374. State v. Avirett, 76 Md. 514.

Ibid. sec. 8. 1867, ch. 388

8. In all cases, civil and criminal, in which any or either
party shall demur to any indictment, declaration, plea, replica-
tion, rejoinder, sur-rejoinder, or other plea of any description,
of the opposite party, and the said demurrer shall be overruled,
the party demurring shall have the right to plead over to the
facts of the case by way of traverse or otherwise without with-
drawing his demurrer, and upon appeal or writ of error shall
have the questions of law arising upon the demurrer decided
and determined as fully to every intent as if the party demurring
had not pleaded over.
Barabasz v. Kabat, 91 Md. 55.

Ibid sec. 9. 1860, art. 75, sec. 8. 1809, ch. 153, sec. 2. 1856, ch. 112, sec. 40.

1888, ch. 547.

9. No judgment shall be arrested or set aside for any omis-
sion of mere matter of form, nor because one or more of the
counts in the declaration may be bad, if there be one count
sufficient in substance, nor because of any misjoinder of forms
of actions or of counts, nor for any other matter or cause which
might have been subject of general demurrer to the declaration
or other pleadings.

Gordon v. Downey, 1 Gill, 41. B. G. P. R. W. Co. v. Wilkinson, 30 Md.
224. Eakle v. Clark, 30 Md. 322 Canton Bldg Asso. v. Weber, 34 Md 669.
Streeks v. Dyer, 39 Md. 424. Spencer v. Trafford, 42 Md. 1 Loney v.
Bailey, 43 Md. 10. Gaither v. Wilmer, 71 Md. 367. Huntington v. Emery,
74 Md. 70. Charles Co v. Mandanyohl, 93 Md. 155.

Ibid sec 10. 1860, art. 75, sec 10 1856, ch. 112, sec 89. 1888, ch. 547.

10. The plaintiff in any action may plead in answer to the

plea, or any subsequent pleading of the defendant, as many