ART. 35] DEPOSITIONS. 1099
upon proof of the fact, may take such deposition upon such
notice as he may prescribe to be given to the opposite party,
his agent, attorney or guardian; and such deposition shall be
available as if taken on ten days' notice; and the commissioner
shall return with his proceeding the proof which induced him
to shorten the notice.
1888, art. 35, sec. 28. 1860, art. 37, sec. 27. 1828, ch. 165, sec. 3.
30. If any person against whom the depositions herein
authorized to be taken are to be used in evidence shall attend
the taking of the same, either in person or by agent, attorney
or guardian, then such depositions shall be admitted in evi-
dence without proof of notice to the party to attend the taking
thereof.
Collins v. Elliott, 1 H. & J. 1. William's v. Banks, 5 Md. 198. Waters v.
Waters, 35 Md. 531.
Ibid. sec. 29. 1860, art. 37, sec. 28. 1826, ch. 222. 1828, ch. 165, sec. 1.
1829, ch 159.
31. Any commissioner appointed by a court having common
law and equity jurisdiction, whether such commissioner be
appointed to take depositions in chancery or depositions.to be
used at law, may take depositions under this article; but no
commissioner shall take depositions out of the county or city
for which he was appointed, except by consent of the parties
in writing, to be returned with the commission.
Stevenson v. Myers, 1 H. & J. 102. Norwood's Lessee v Owings, 1 H. &
J 269. DeSobry v. DeLalstre. 2 H. & J. 191. Brydon v. Taylor, 2 H. & J.
396. Patterson v. Md. Ins. Co., 3 H. & J 71. Johns v. Stoops, 5 H. & J.
431. Williamson v. Dillon, 1 H. & G. 44. Strike v. McDonald, 2 H. & G.
192 Maccubbin v. Cromwell, 2 H. & G 443. Chambers v Chalmers, 4 G.
& J. 420. Birely v. Staley, 5 G. & J. 432. Salmon v Feinour, 6 G. & J 60.
Somerville v. Marbury, 7 G. & J. 275. Harwood v. Jones, 10 G. & J 404
Franklin Bank v. Pa., Del & Md. S N. Co., 11 G & J. 28. Gardner v.
Hardey, 12 G. & J. 365. Brooke v. Berry, 2 Gill 83. Bullitt v. Musgrave.
3 Gill, 31. Md. & N. Y Coal & Iron Co o. Wingert, 8 Gill, 171. Townsend
v. Dungan, 1 Bl. 45. Ringgold v. Jones, 1 Bl 90, (note.) Clapham v.
Thompson, 1 Bl. 123, (note.) Lingan v. Henderson, 1 Bl. 236. Hodges v.
Mullikin, 1 Bl 603. Welch v. Stewart, 2 Bl. 37. Winder v. Diffenderfer,
2 Bl. 191. Helms v Francistius, 2 Bl 544. Salmon v. Clagett, 3 Bl. 125.
McKim v. Odom, 3 Bl. 407. Chew v. Farmers' Bank, 2 Md. Ch. 231. Ibid
9 Gill, 361 Hughes v. Jones, 2 Md. Ch. 289. Ridgeway v. Toran, 2 Md.
Ch. 303. Young v. Mackall, 3 Md. Ch. 398. Ibid., 4 Md. 362. Tolson v
Tolson, 4 Md. Ch. 119. Cherry v Stem, 11 Md. 19. Walters v. Munroe, 17
Md. 154. Waters' Lessee v. Riggin, 19 Md. 549 Matthews v. Dare, 20
Md 248. Brandt r. Mickle, 28 Md. 436
|
|