696 EVIDENCE—PERPETUATING BOUNDARIES. [ART. 35.

he was appointed, except by consent of the parties in writing, to
be returned with the commission.

Stevenson v. Myers, 1 H & J 102 Norwood's Lessee v. Owings, 1 H. & J.
269. DeSobry v. DeLaistre, 2 H. & J. 191. Brydon v. Taylor, 2 H & J. 396.
Patterson v. Md Ins Co , 3 H. & J 71. Johns v. Stoops, 5 H. & J 431. Wil-
liamson v. Dillon, 1 H. & G 44. Strike v. McDonald, 2 H. & G. 192. Mac-
cubbin v. Cromwell, 2 H & G. 443 Chambers v. Chalmers, 4 G. & J 420
Birely v. Staley, 5 G & J 432 Salmon v. Feinour, 6 G. & J 60 Somerville

v. Marbury, 7 G & T 275 Harwood v. Jones, 10 Q & J. 404. Franklin Bank
v. Pa. Del & Md S N Co , 11 G & J. 28. Gardner v. Hardey, 12 G. & J. 365.
Brooke v. Berry, 2 Gill, 83. Bullitt v. Musgrave, 3 Gill, 31 Md & N Y. Coal
& Iron Co v. Wingert, 8 Gill, 171. Townsend v. Dungan, 1 Bl 45. Ringgold

v. Jones, 1 Bl 90, (note ) Claphamp. Thompson, 1 Bl 123, (note ) Lingan
v. Henderson, 1 Bl. 236. Hodges v. Mulliken, 1 Bl 503. Welch v. Stewart,
2 Bl. 37 Winder v. Diffenderffer, 2 Bl. 191 Helms v. Franciscus, 2 Bl 544.
Salmon v. Clagett, 3 Bl 125 McKim v. Odom, 3 Bl 407 Chew v. Farmers'
Bank, 2 Md Ch 231 Ibid , 9 Gill, 361, Hughes v. Jones, 2 Md Ch. 289.
Ridgeway v. Toran, 2 Md Ch 303. Young v. Mackall, 3 Md. Ch 398. Ibid.,
4 Md 302. Tolson v. Tolson, 4 Md. Ch 119 Cherry v. Stein, 11 Md. 19.
Walters v. Munroe, 17 Md 154 Waters' Lessee n Riggin, 19 Md 549. Mat-
thews v. Dare, 20 Md 248. Brandt v. Mickle, 28 Md 436.

Commissions to Perpetuate Boundaries of Lands.

P. G L., (1860,) art. 37, sec 29 1723, ch. 8, sec. 2.

30. Upon petition of any person seized or possessed of lands
in his own or any other right, to the circuit court for the county
where the land lies, or the superior court of Baltimore city if the
land lies in the city of Baltimore, for a commission to examine
evidences to prove or perpetuate the memory of any of the
bounds of such lands, or of any other lands whereon the lands he
shall be so seized or possessed of shall depend, or whereto they
relate, the court to which such petition shall be preferred may
grant a commission to four substantial and capable freeholders
within the said county or city, not being in any way related to
any of the parties or interested in the land, empowering them,
or any three or two of them, (they having first taken an oath
before the said court or some justice of the peace, duly and
impartiaily to examine and certify such evidences,) to issue sum-
mons for all such evidences as shall be to them named by the
petitioner or other person concerned, to appear before them at a
certain day by them to be appointed, upon the lands, the bound-
aries whereof are to be proved or perpetuated, and to examine all