442 COURTS. [ART. 26-

right to have a writ of scire facias to renew or revive the some;
and on all such judgments or decrees the plaintiff may have more-
than one attachment or execution to be laid in the hands of
different persons, or levied on other property or effects than that
taken under the first, though the first be still outstanding; pro-
vided that but one satisfaction of the debt or demand shall be
made, and that it shall be in the discretion of the court in all such
cases, whether any costs, and if any, what amount of costs shall
be allowed on the subsequent attachments or other executions.
The provisions of this section, shall apply also to attachments or
executions, directed to a county different from that where the
judgment or decree was rendered, or to or from the city of
Baltimore.

Arnott v. Nicholls, 1 H. & J. 471. Salmon v. Yates, 1 H. & J. 488. McEl-
derry v. Smiths' Lessee, 2 H. & J. 72. Barney v. Patterson, 6 H. & J. 194
Hanson v. Barnes' Lessee, 3 G. & J. 359. Mullikin v. Duvall, 7 G. & J. 355.
Townshend, Ex'x. v. Townshend, 10 G. & J. 373. Nesbit v. Manro, 11 G. &.
J. 261. Murphy B. Cord, 12 G. & J. 182. Miles v. Knott, 12 G. & J. 443
Jones v. Jones, 1 Bl. 443. Tessier v. Wyse, 3 Bl. 28. Boyd t. Hams, 1 Md..
Ch. 466. Hodges v. Sevier, 4 Md. Ch. 382. Doub e Barnes, 4 Gill 1. War-
field v. Brewer, 4 Gill 265. Cushwa v. Cushwa, 5 Md. 55. Kemp v. Cook, 6.
Md. 305. Trail v. Snouffer, 6 Md. 308. Moore v. Garrettson, 6 Md. 444.
Elliott's Lessee v. Knott, 14 Md. 121. Huston v. Ditto, 20 Md. 305. Hazle-
hurst v. Morris, 28 Md. 67. Hardesty v. Campbell, 29 Md 533. Mitchell v.
Chesnut, 31 Md. 521. Goldsborough v. Green, 32 Md. 91. Kirkland v. Krebs,
34 Md. 93. Hagerstown Bank v. Thomas, 35 Md 515. Anderson v. Graff, 41
Md. 601. Manton v. Hoyt, 43 Md. 264. Weikel v. Cate, 58 Md. 110. Lamb-
son v. Moffet, 61 Md. 429.

P. G. L, (1860,) art. 29, sec. 18. 1839, ch. 14.

21. A judgment rendered against one or more members of a
partnership, or one or more persons jointly liable on any bill,
bond, covenant, promissory note, bill of exchange, contract or
agreement whatsoever, less than the whole number of partners or
persons so bound, shall not work an extinguishment or merger of"
the cause of action on which such judgment may have been
rendered, as respects the liability of the partners or persons not.
bound by such judgment; and they shall remain liable to be
sued as if their original responsibility had been joint and several;,
provided, that but one satisfaction of the debt or demand shall be
made.

Williams v. Hodgson. 2 H. & J. 474. Moale v. Hollins, 11 G. & J. 11.
Davidson v. Kelly, 1 Md. 500. Thomas v. Mohler, 25 Md. 36. Gott v. State,
44 Md. 319. Cruzen v. McKaig, 57 Md. 461.