clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
The Maryland Code, Public General Laws, 1888
Volume 389, Page 1132   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

1132 PLEADINGS, PRACTICE AND PROCESS AT LAW. [ART. 75.

the extent of such title, though other plaintiffs may be joined who
have no interest, or may have parted with their interest.
Carroll's Lessee v. Norwood, 5 H. & J. 174.

P. G. L., (1860,) art. 75, sec. 52. 1852, ch. 177, sec. 2.

76. In all actions at law, where the title to land is in question,
it shall not be necessary for any party to any such action to prove
that the lands in controversy have been patented; but a patent
shall in all cases be presumed in favor of the party showing a
title otherwise good; and actual enclosure shall not be necessary
to prove possession, but acts of exclusive user and ownership,

other than enclosure, may be given in evidence to the jury, to
prove possession.

Lloyd v. Gordon, 2 H. & McH 254. Cheney v. Ringgold, 2 H. & J. 87. Hall

v. Gittings, 2 H. & J. 112 Hammond v. Ridgely, 5 H. & J. 264. Casey v.
Inlocs. 1 Gill, 500. Cresap's Lessee v. Hutson, 9 Gill, 269. Hoye v. Swan's
Lessee, 5 Md. 237. Armstrong v. Risteau, 5 Md. 256. Stump v. Henry, 6 Md.
202. Warner v. Hardy, 6 Md. 525, Thistle v. Frostburg Coal Co., 10 Md. 130.
Ridgely v. Bond, 17 Md. 14. Van Bibber's Lessee v. Frazier, 17 Md. 436.

Gittings v. Moale, 21 Md 135. Morgan's Lessee v.Slider, 22 Md. 267. Nut-
well v. Tongue's Lessee, 22 Md. 419. Dean v. Brown, 23 Md. 11. Davis v.
Furlow, 27 Md 536. Morrison v. Hammond's Lessee, 27 Md. 604. Israel v.
Israel. 30 Md. 125. Beatty's Lessee v. Mason, 30 Md. 414. Newman v. Young's
Lessee, 30 Md. 417. Baker v. Swan's Lessee, 32 Md 358. Hammond v. Mor-
rison's Lessee, 33 Md. 102. Campbell's Lessee v. Fletcher, 37 Md. 430. Camp-
bell v. Shipley, 41 Md. 81. Hiss v. McCabe, 45 Md. 83.

Ibid. sec. 53. 1852, ch. 177, sec. 3.

77. No warrant of resurvey shall issue in any action of eject-
ment unless the court shall be satisfied that there is a dispute
about the location of the lands claimed in said action; nor shall
any issue in other actions, unless there is a dispute about the
location of the lands, for the injury of which damages are claimed,

or unless the court shall be satisfied that plats are necessary for
illustration.

Mitchell v. Mitchell, 2 Gill, 230. Ibid., 8 Gill, 98. Ibid., 1 Md. 44. Ibid., 6
Md. 224. Newman v. Young's Lessee, 30 Md. 417. Parker v. Willis, 60 Md. 16.

Ibid. sec. 54. 1852, ch. 177, sec. 4.

78. In any action where the parties hold or claim under the
same title the lands in dispute, no warrant of resurvey shall issue,

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
The Maryland Code, Public General Laws, 1888
Volume 389, Page 1132   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives