ART. 75.] PRACTICE—EJECTMENT. 1131

ment obtained and execution executed, pay all costs and damages
sustained by such lessor or person entitled to the remainder or
reversion as aforesaid, and perform all the covenants and agree-
ments which, on the part and behalf of the first lessee, are and
ought to be performed.

Walter v. Alexander, 2 Gill, 213. Cooke v. Brice, 20 Md. 402. Mackenzie
v. Renshaw, 55 Md. 300. Abrahams v. Tappe, 60 Md. 322.

P. G. L., (1860,) art. 75, sec. 47. 1872, ch. 346.

71. When the lands sued for lie contiguous to each other, and
in adjoining counties, suit may be brought for the whole in any
of said counties in wlu'ch any of the defendants reside; and if
none of the defendants reside in any of said counties, then the
suit may be brought in the county where the largest part of the
land lies, and the sheriff and surveyor of the county in which the
suit is brought shall have power to execute and return the war-
rant of resurvey of all the lands so sued for, and said sheriff shall
also have power to execute a writ of habere facias possessionem
for all of said lands.

Ibid. sec. 48. 1829, ch. 186, sec. 1.

72. In any action of ejectment against two or more defendants
they may sever in their defence; bat if plats be necessary, there
shall be but one set returned, which shall show the claims and
pretensions of all the parties.

Ibid. sec. 49. 1829, ch. 186, sec. 3.

73. Where defendants in ejectment sever in their defence,
the court shall apportion the costs in such manner as may seem,
reasonable and just.

Ibid. sec. 50. 1833, ch. 276, sec. 2.

74. In all cases of a joint holding by two or more persons, they
may declare jointly whether they hold as joint tenants, tenants in
common, or in any other manner.

Ibid. sec. 51. 1833, ch. 276, sec. 3.

75. If, on the trial of an ejectment, title be shown in any of
the plaintiffs, it shall be sufficient to authorize him to recover to