clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
The Annotated Code of the Public General Laws of Maryland, 1924
Volume 375, Page 2204   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

2204 ARTICLE 66.

Unless these sections are complied with, no injunction to restrain a mortgage sale
will ordinarily be granted. Requisites of bill; bill held insufficient. Fowler v.
Pendleton, 121 Md. 300.

There must be an allegation that both interest and principal have been paid.
The fraud must be particularly stated. This section held applicable, and not. to
have been complied with. Thrift v. Bannon, 111 Md. 307.

Jurisdiction of court depends upon allegations alone. Extent of such jurisdiction.
Barrick v. Horner, 78 Md. 258. And see Gayle v. Fattle, 14 Md. 84.

Mere payment of usury will not entitle mortgagor to an injunction; contra, if
payments on principal and interest are equal to or greater than indebtedness. Gantt
v. Grindall, 49 Md. 313; Walker v. Cockey, 38 Md. 78; Powell v. Hopkins, 38 Md.
13; Talbott v. Laurel Bldg. Assn., 140 Md. 568.

Purpose of this section. It is only declaratory of a general principle of equity.
Powell v. Hopkins, 38 Md. 11; Talbott v. Laurel Bldg. Assn., 140 Md. 568.

A sale will not be stayed because a stranger has instituted ejectment, there being
no allegation that his claim is valid. Gayle v. Fattle, 14 Md. 85.

This section is not applicable to mortgage sales under the local law applicable to
Baltimore city. Abrahams v. Tappe, 60 Md. 322.

This section referred to in construing sec. 9. Warfield v. Ross, 38 Md. 90.

For a note on injunctions " affecting mortgages and parties thereto," see Salmon v.
Clagett, 3 Bl. 125.

Cited but not construed in Heck v. Renika, 47 Md. 75.

As to injunctions in general, see art. 16, sec. 81, et seq.

An. Code, sec. 17. 1904, sec. 17. 1888, sec. 17. 1826, ch. 192, sec. 8.

17. If any such injunction shall be granted the court or judge grant-
ing the same shall have power, on proof of ten days' notice to the plaintiff,
to hear and decide on a motion to dissolve such injunction, and on hearing
any such motion, if the court or judge shall feel satisfied that the same
was obtained through misrepresentation and for delay, the court or judge
shall decree that the party who obtained the same shall pay interest to the
mortgagee or to the party claiming under him at the rate of ten per cent,
per annum on the amount of the mortgage debt from the time of granting
the injunction until the same shall be dissolved and shall enforce the execu-
tion of such decree as in other cases.

An. Code, sec. 18. 1904, sec. 18. 1888, sec. 18. 1826, ch. 192, sec. 8.

18. Before granting any such injunction the court or judge granting
the same shall require the plaintiff or some person on his behalf, with at
least two good securities to be approved by said judge or clerk, to execute
to the mortgagee or person claiming or acting under him, and file in court
a bond in such penalty as the court or judge shall prescribe, conditioned to
obey, abide by, perform and fulfill such decree and order as shall be made
in the premises, upon which bond the mortgagee or his assigns shall be en-
titled to recover all such debt, damages, interest and costs as shall be de-
creed on dissolving the injunction.

There is no statute in this state authorizing equity to determine the damages sus-
tained by a defendant by reason of issue of an injunction against him unless such
power is conferred by this section or by art. 16, sec. 84; even if it were assumed
that equity had such authority, it has never been the practice to exercise it. This
section refers only to sales and proceedings under power of sale contained in
mortgages referred to in this article, and has n.o application to injunctions to restrain
proceedings to foreclose other mortgages; case disposed of without reference to
this section. American Bonding Co. v. State, 120 Md. 316.

Where before sale under foreclosure proceedings it is observed that bond required
by this section as a prerequisite to an injunction has not been filed, the injunction

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
The Annotated Code of the Public General Laws of Maryland, 1924
Volume 375, Page 2204   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives