clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
The Annotated Code of the Public General Laws of Maryland, 1924
Volume 375, Page 2203   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

MORTGAGES. 2203

This section has no application if the terms in power of sale are different from
those provided by act of 1825, ch. 203, and said provisions are not complied with.
Korns v. Shaffer, 27 Md. 90; White v. Malcolm, 15 Md. 541.

This section applied. Chilton v. Brooks, 71 Md. 452; Dircks v. Logsdon, 59
Md. 179.

This section referred to as showing that mortgagees are given exceptional privi-
leges. Chilton v. Brooks, 69 Md. 587.

An. Code, sec. 15. 1904, sec. 15. 1888, sec. 15. 1825, ch. 203, sec. 10.

15. All mortgage sales shall be made in the county or city where the
mortgaged premises are situated; and where the mortgaged premises de-
scribed in any mortgage are situated in more than one county, the sale
may be made in either of the counties in which the lands are situated.

This section is mandatory, and if sale is not made in the county where the prop-
erty lies, it will be set aside. Webb v. Haeffer, 53 Md. 190.

This section applies to technical mortgages; an instrument held not to be a techni-
cal mortgage, and hence application of this section, denied. Harrison v. Annapolis,
etc., R. R. Co., 50 Md. 515. And see Bank of Commerce y. Lanahan, 45 Md. 409.

Where a mortgage when executed covers property in Baltimore county, and subse-
quently annexation act changes geographical location of the property to Baltimore
city, the sale thereafter should take place in the city. Chilton v. Brooks, 71 Md. 452.

This section applies only to sales under the act of 1825, ch. 203. White v. Malcolm,
15 Md. 541 (decided in 1860).

This section referred to in construing sec. 8. Roberts v. Loyola Bldg. Assn., 74
Md. 5.

An. Code, sec. 16. 1904, sec. 16, 1888, sec. 16. 1826, ch. 192, sec. 8. 1836, ch. 249, sec. 16.

16. No injunction shall be granted to stay any sale or any proceedings
after any sale of mortgaged premises under this article, unless the party
praying such injunction shall be also a party to the deed of mortgage in
virtue of which the property sold or offered for sale shall have been mort-
gaged, or shall claim under such party a right to or interest in such mort-
gaged premises, derived and accruing after the time of recording such
mortgage, nor unless such party shall on oath allege that the mortgage
debt and all interest due thereon has been fully paid, or that some part of
such debt or interest, the amount of which he shall state, has been paid,
and that the mortgagee or person acting under him refuses to give credit for
such amount, or that some fraud which shall be particularly stated in the
bill or petition for injunction was used by such mortgagee, or with his
knowledge, in obtaining the mortgage.

Where a petition for an injunction under this section alleges that the mortgage
debt and interest were fully satisfied under terms of an agreement and appeal
is from a final decree for a permanent injunction on that ground, the objection that
petition does not allege that mortgage and all interest due thereon had been paid, and
contention that bond filed as a prerequisite to issue of a preliminary injunction was
not in form prescribed by law, overruled. Green v. Redmond, 132 Md. 171.

Before court will grant an injunction to restrain a sale upon default in a mortgage,
the mortgagor must pay into court amount admitted to be due. Injunction im-
properly granted. Question of credits. Buckner v. Cronhardt, 132 Md. 616.

This section does not authorize relief in violation of principle that he who seeks
equity must do equity. Where the mortgagor admits in his bill that a balance is
due mortgagee, that amount must be paid mortgagee or brought into court before
mortgagor is entitled to an injunction. Talbott v. Laurel Bldg. Assn., 140 Md. 568.

A purchaser who has a valid contract for sale of property by reason of exercise
of an option, may secure an injunction under this section, and is entitled to redeem
property when it is being sold under foreclosure of mortgage proceedings. Tender
held sufficient to entitle plaintiff to injunction. Parties. Wingert v. Brewer, 116 Md.
518.

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
The Annotated Code of the Public General Laws of Maryland, 1924
Volume 375, Page 2203   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives