Volume 211, Page 2667 View pdf image (33K) |
1424 JOURNAL OF PROCEEDINGS [Apl. 4,
The proposed amendments were severally read and Also, The following amendment:
AMENDMENT PROPOSED.
The question then recurring upon the adoption of the Mr. Seth demanded the yeas and nays. The demand heing sustained, The yeas and nays were called and appeared as follows:
AFFIRMATIVE.
Hines, Speaker, Duer, Hart,
NEGATIVE. Robinson, Latchford, Dawson, Bird, Kemp, Williams, Hawkins, Pruitt, Greenfield, Seth, Merrill, Berry, Valliant, Koons, Grimes, Sudler, Miller, Stake, Coulbourn, Lamar, Clark, Johnson, Nicodemus, Watkins, Hodson, Annan, Park, Turner, of Cecil, Grafton, Brace, Davis, Riley, Glotfelty—33. So the amendment was rejected.
The question then recurring upon the passage of the
It was rejected (for want of a constitutional majority,) by |
||||
Volume 211, Page 2667 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.