950

JOURNAL OF PROCEEDINGS [Mar. 20,

The first five sections of the bill are modelled after the Act
of 1872, chapter 10. If the same means had been provided
in this bill for the enforcement of fines, as are given by that
Act, I should have signed the bill instead of returning it, as
I now do, without my approval.

JAMES BLACK GROOME.
Which, was read.

Also,

Delivered the bill named therein.

The question then recurring (as prescribed by the Consti-
tution, Article 2, section 17,) upon the reconsideration of the
vote by which said bill had been passed,

The vote was reconsidered.

The question then recurring upon the passage of the bill.

Mr. Freaner submitted the following order:

Ordered, That this veto of the Governor be concurred in,
inasmuch as it meets with the approbation of the delegation
from Garrett county.

Which was adopted.
The question then being,

"Shall this bill pass, notwithstanding the objections of the
Governor?"

The yeas and nays were called, (as required by Article 2,
section 17, of the Constitution,) and appeared as follows:

AFFIRMATIVE—Non e.

NEGATIVE,
Messrs.

Hines, Speaker, Pruitt, Groh,

Robinson, Miller, Fenton,

Nutwell, Nicodemus, Freaner,

Lancaster, Annan, Grimes,

Hawkins, Grafton, Clark,

Keech, Lee, Fletchall,

Buchanan, Williams, Park,

Seth, T. H. Hamilton, Brace,

Valliant, C. R. Hamilton, Waters,

Duer, McAleese, Vanderford,

Turner, of Cecil, Gill, Brown,

Mackey, Hart, Stewart, of How'd,

Davis, McColgan, Bedsworth,

Latchford, Harig, Glotfelty—44.

Thompson, Joyce,