clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings and Acts of the General Assembly, 1874
Volume 211, Page 1976   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

1874.] OF THE HOUSE OF DELEGATES. 733

The Speaker laid before the House the following communi-
cation from Hon. A. K. Syester, Attorney-General of the
State, in response to an order of the House:

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Hagerstown, March 10th, 1874.
To the Honorable the House of Delegates:

GENTLEMEN:—I am in receipt of the order of the House of
Delegates, of the 6th, which I am asked to furnish "the Select
Committee of the House, appointed to consider the matter,
with the information as to whether or not it is competent to
the Legislature to amend the charter of the Baltimore and
Fredericktown Turnpike Company, so as to procure the paving
of that portion of the Company's Road lying within the City
of Baltimore."

The charter of this Company was granted many years be-
fore the adoption of the Constitution of 1851. The Legisla-
ture, in that Act of Incorporation, did not reserve the right to
alter or amend the charter, and it is not competent to so
amend the charter as to impose on the Company any duty or
obligation not mentioned in the charter. There have been
amendments to the charter of the Company, but none since
1851, and in none of these amendments is the power to alter
or amend reserved.

If by the expression in the order before me, "procuring the
paving," &c.,is meant so to change the charter of that Com-
pany as to require it to pave that part of its Road, it is quite
plain to my mind that it cannot be done.

No amendment of the charter of this Company, not accept-
ed by the Company, could be effectual to alter or change that
instrument. Certainly not effectual in imposing duties and
obligations on the Company, not mentioned in the original
Act or some one of its amendments.

I am, very respectfully,

Your obedient servant,

A. K. SYESTER.

Which was read and referred the Select Committee on that
subject.

Mr. Mackey presented the petition of Jos. R. Brown and
sixty-two other citizens, asking for a change in the law re-
lating to the present system of serving summons in Cecil
county.

Which was read and referred to the Cecil delegation.

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings and Acts of the General Assembly, 1874
Volume 211, Page 1976   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives