Volume 211, Page 1939 View pdf image (33K) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
696 J OURNAL OF PROCEEDINGS [Mar. 10,
against the passage of the Supplemental Civil Rights Bill, Said Resolutions being upon a second reading,
Mr. Brace moved that the further consideration thereof be Decided in the negative.
Mr. Brace moved that the further consideration thereof be The question recurring upon concurring in the motion, Mr. Brace demanded the yeas and nays. The demand being sustained, The yeas and nays were called and appeared as follows:
AFFIRMATIVE.
Bird, Lamar, Park,
NEGATIVE. Hines, Speaker, Mackey, McColgan, Bond, Davis, Joyce, Colton, Latchford, Groh, Merritt, Robey, Fenton, Henkle, Thompson, Berry, Robinson, Kemp, Freaner, Nutwell, Pruitt, Grimes, Turner, of Calv't,Merill, Stake, Lancaster, Grafton, Clark, Hawkins, Lee, Watkins, Keech, Riley, Fletchall, Buchanan, Dawson, Vanderford, Matthews, McCosker, Galt, Seth, T. H. Hamilton, Brown, Valliant, Cooper, Maclin, Sudler, Staylor, Stewart, of How'd, Coulbourn, Gill, Leonard, Gordy, Loane, West—56. Hodson, Greenfield,
So the motion did not prevail.
|
![]() | |||
![]() | ||||
![]() |
Volume 211, Page 1939 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.