Volume 211, Page 1759 View pdf image (33K) |
516 JOURNAL OF PROCEEDINGS [Feb. 26,
The question then recurring upon the adoption of the
Mr. Turner, of Baltimore county, submitted the following AMENDMENT PROPOSED.
Section 1: Strike out from the word "all." line 2, down
The question recurring upon the adoption of the amend-
Mr. Turner, of Baltimore county, demanded the yeas and The demand being sustained, The yeas and nays were called and appeared as follows :
AFFIRMATIVE.
Bond, Turner, of B. co., Williams,
NEGATIVE. Hines, Speaker, Merrill, McColgan, Colton, Miller, Harig, Robinson, Nicodemus, Joyce, Nutwell, Annan, Groh, Lancaster, Dawson, Fenton, Buchanan, McCosker, Clark, Seth, T. H. Hamilton, Watkins, Sudler, Cooper, Fletchall, Coulbourn, C. R. Hamilton, Wier, Duer, McWilliams, Wack, Gordy, Foster, Park, Hodson, Staylor, Brace, Davis, Stewart, of B. city, Waters, Etchisou, McAleese, Vandorford, Latchford, Gill, Galt, Robey, Hart, Maclin, Thompson, Loane, Stewart, of H'd—53. Pruitt, Greenfield, So the amendment was rejected.
The question then recurring upon the. adoption of the
It was adopted.
|
||||
Volume 211, Page 1759 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.