408 DEAKINS' CASE.

inch had filed the vouchers of his claims; but, from some error or
defect in the original decree or other proceedings, no notice had
been given to his creditors to file the vouchers of their claims
against his estate. And that a copy of the order of the 10th of
August, had been served on the trustee Hebb, but he had not yet
complied with it. Whereupon the petitioner prayed for an attach-
ment against Hebb; and that the creditors of the late William Dea-
kins, might be notified to file the vouchers of their claims, &c.

22d January, 1830.—BLAND, Chancellor.—Ordered, that an at-
tachment issue against William F. Hebb as prayed, returnable forth-
with. That the creditors of William Deakins, deceased, file the
Touchers of their claims in the chancery office, on or before the
22d day of June next. And that a copy of this order be inserted
in some newspaper, printed at Cumberland, once in each of three
successive weeks, before the first day of March next.

On the 15th of March, 1830, the trustee made a report, on oath,
in which he stated, that the purchaser having refused payment, he
had put the notes taken by him for the purchase money into the
hands of an attorney, to bring suit thereon; that they were then in
his hands for that purpose.

11th March, 1830.—BLAND, Chancellor.—The attachment issued
against William F. Hebb, having been returned attached, it is on
motion of the solicitor, for the petitioner Hoye, Ordered, that the
sheriff of Washington county forthwith bring into court the body
of the said William F. Hebb, according to the tenor of the said
attachment.

On the 30th of April, 1830, the trustee Hebb made another re-
port, on oath, similar to that filed on the 15th of March. On the
13th of December, 1830, the executors King and Hebb, filed objec-
tions to an allowance of any of the claims now filed, or which
might hereafter be filed, &c. Some time after which, the matters
in controversy were finally adjusted by an agreement among the
parties, and the case so closed.