clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 3, Page 383   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

THE U. S. INS. COMPANY VS. SHRIVER ET AL. 383
ral Insurance Company in the sum of $15,000, executed to
that Company a mortgage of this property, on the 16th of
January, 1834, which was duly acknowledged and recorded
among the land records of Baltimore County, on the 2d of
April following; and on the 29th of March, of the same year,
he executed to the United States Insurance Company, to se-
cure the payment of the sum of $80,000, a mortgage of this,
with sundry other parcels of property, which last-mentioned
mortgage was, also, duly acknowledged and recorded, on the
day of its date; and the question is, which of these two mort-
gages is entitled to priority ?
It is maintained, first, on the part of the General Insurance
Company, that inasmuch as Freeman, the mortgagor, had but
an equitable interest in the premises, there was no necessity
at all for the registration of the deed, and that, consequently,
the United States Insurance Company are not entitled to be
preferred, because their deed was placed first upon the records.
In other words, the position is, that conveyances of equitable
interests in lands, are not within the Registry Acts. If they
are, then, according to the express terms of the first section of
the Act of 1825, ch. 203, the deed first recorded must be pre-
ferred; unless, indeed, it can be shown, that when that deed
was taken, the grantee had actual notice of the unregistered
conveyance.
This question, with reference to the necessity of recording
conveyances from parties holding equitable estates, arose in the
case of the Ohio Life Insurance and Trust Company vs. Winn
and Ross, 2 Md. Oh. Decisions, 25; and although it does not
distinctly appear that it was made a point in the argument at
the bar, it was expressly decided by the Court, and upon sub-
sequent reflection, I am persuaded was correctly decided. It
appears to me to be quite clear, that conveyances of such
titles to real estate are within the wise and salutary policy of
our Registration Acts; and that one of the great ends of those
Acts, as declared in the preamble to that of 1766, ch. 14,
would be defeated, and creditors and purchasers exposed to
many of the hazards, which it was the design of the legisia-

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 3, Page 383   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives