clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 3, Page 382   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

882 HIGH COURT OF CHANCERY.
clearly proved, as to make it fraudulent in the purchaser, to take md re-
gister a conveyance in prejudice to the known title of the party holding
the first conveyance.
Notice given to a director of an incorporated institution, privately, or which
he acquires from rumor, or through channels open to all alike, and which
he does not communicate to his associates at the board, will not bind the
institution.
But if the notice is given to him officially, for the purpose of being commu-
nicated to the board, although such notice should not be so communicated,
the institution is bound by it.
If one party has a lien on, or interest in, two funds for a debt, and another
party has a lien on, or interest in only one of the funds for another debt,
the latter has a right in equity to compel the former to resort to the other
fund, in the first instance, for satisfaction, if that course H necessary for
the satisfaction of the claims of both parties.
[The facts of this case, are stated in the Chancellor's
opinion.]
THE CHANCELLOR :
Although, for the reason stated to the counsel during the
argument, I cannot now pass a final decree in this cause, I
shall proceed, very briefly, to express my opinion upon some of
the questions which have been discussed.
These questions are important, and, perhaps, not free from
difficulty; and the conclusions to which, upon a careful consi-
deration of them, I have arrived, have not been formed without
considerable doubt and distrust.
The proceedings show, that in March, 1827, Christian
Keener, David Keener, and Samuel Keener, purchased of
Andrew Shriver, and others, a house and lot, on Market
Street, in the City of Baltimore, for the sum of $10,000, for
which they took a bond, conditioned for the conveyance thereof
on payment of the purchase-money; that they did pay a part,
and were put in possession, and subsequently sold the same to
William H. Freeman, who took possession, and paid his ven-
dors, the Keeners, on account thereof, the sum of $7,000,
being the amount which they, the Keeners, had paid the Shri-
vers; the balance of the purchase-money, due the latter from
the Keeners, being, by agreement, to be paid by Freeman.
In this state of things, Freeman, being indebted to the Gene-

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 3, Page 382   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives