clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search		 search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 3, Page 332   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
   << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

382 HIGH COURT OF CHANCERY.
of the defendants, and three other parties, certain lands, and
took a bond of conveyance therefor, signed by all the parties.
They paid the purchase-money aa it came due, excepting the
last two notes for $300 each, due to the defendants respec-
tively, which they refused to pay, upon the ground that certain
taxes upon the lands, for the years 1845 and 1846, had not
been paid by the defendants; and the present bill was filed for
an injunction to restrain the defendants from proceeding at law
to collect these notes. Upon this bill the Chancellor made
the following remarks.]
THE CHANCELLOR:
An injunction cannot issue upon this bill without a bond.
The opinion of the Court of Appeals, in the case of Alexander
vs. Ghiselin, in 5 Gill, 188, establishes the rule in all such
cases. The bill does not state how much will remain due after
deducting the taxes, for which a credit is claimed. This should
appear, and this balance ought to be brought into Court, to be
paid to the defendants, the vendors of the land.
[An amended bill was then filed, setting forth the amount of
the taxes for which a credit was claimed; and the amount of
the notes, with interest, was paid into Court. An injunction
was then granted, as prayed, upon the filing of a bond, and
after answers, proof, and other proceedings, the case was set
down for final hearing, when the Chancellor delivered the fol-
lowing opinion, in which the facts of the case are sufficiently
stated.]
THE CHANCELLOR:
If this could, upon any fair construction of its statements,
be regarded as a bill for the specific performance of the con-
tract of purchase, mentioned in the bond of conveyance filed aa
an exhibit, there could, of course, be no doubt of the jurisdic-
tion of this Court to grant that relief, and it would certainly
be quite willing to do so, provided the facts and circumstances
of the case made it proper.

  		clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 3, Page 332   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
   << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.

Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!

An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives