clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 3, Page 331   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

REYNOLDS VS. HOWARD, 331
James, who, I have no doubt, is a gentleman of the highest re-
spectability, but because the facts deposed to by him are not,
in my opinion, of that character which would warrant the Court
in disregarding its own rule, and establishing another materi-
ally affecting the rights of property.
My opinion, therefore, is, that the account B, reported by
the Auditor, is correct, and I shall pass an order ratifying it.
GBAFTON L. DULANY, for the Complainants.
THOS. DONALDSON, for the Insurance Company.
EDWARD REYNOLDS AND OTHERS,
vs.
MARGARETTA HOWARD AND EMILY
HOWARD.
DECEMBER TERM, 1860.
[CHANCERY PRACTICE—INJUNCTION—EXTENT Of JURISDICTION OF THIS COURT.]
An injunction to restrain proceedings at law for the collection of money due
upon notes of hand, given to the vendors for the purchase-money of land,
cannot issue without an injunction bond; and where the bill asks for such
injunction upon the ground of credits claimed, the amount of such credits
should appear, and the balance brought into Court, to be paid to the
vendors.
Where such a bill was filed against two only of the five vendors, and the only
ground of complaint is the refusal to allow such credits, it cannot be re-
garded as a bill for the specific performance of the contract of purchase,
and the want of necessary parties would forbid the granting of such relief,
even if the evidence showed the complainants entitled to it.
The amount of such credits claimed being less than five pounds, it is not suffi-
ciently large to sustain the jurisdiction of this Court.
By the Act of 1716, ch. 41, this Court cannot hear, determine, or give relief
in any cause, matter, or thing, wherein the original debt or damages does
not amount to 1201 pounds of tobacco, or five pounds and one penny in
money.
[The complainants in this case, in March, 1847, purchased

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 3, Page 331   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives