clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 1, Page 95   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

CULLISON VS. BOSSOM. 95

CULLISON AND WIFE

v. SEPTEMBER TERM, 1847.
JOHN BOSSOM ET AL. 3

[DEMURRER—DISCOVERY——AMENDMENT.]

UPON a. demurrer to a bill, because it sought to compel the defendants to a dis-
closure of their titles, HELD—

That the right of a plaintiff in equity to the benefit of the defendant's oath, is
limited to a discovery of such material facts as relate to the plaintiff's case ;

and does not extend to a discovery of the manner in which, or the evidence
by means of which, the defendant's case is to be established.

Where there is a privity shown to exist between the title of the plaintiff and
defendant, that privity may give him the right to call for an exposure of the
defendant's title; but unless such connection is shown, he has no such right,
whether the bill be for discovery only, or for discovery and relief.

The title of the plaintiffs not appearing to be at all dependent upon, or con-
nected with, that of the defendant, the demurrer was ruled good.

Allowing a demurrer to a whole bill, in strictness, puts it out of court, and no
subsequent proceedings can be taken in the cause; yet, the court has some-
times permitted an amendment of the bill to be made.

[This case was brought before the court on a demurrer to
the bill—the arguments of the solicitors for the parties, having
been submitted to the Chancellor in writing.

The bill was filed by the grand-daughter of Daniel McCo-
mesky, deceased, and her husband, against the defendants, stat-
ing that the latter professed to claim a portion of the lands of
the deceased, through one of his devisees, also deceased. After
tracing the title of the female complainant as one of the heirs
at law, as well to the deceased testator, as to his devisee,
through whom the defendants claim, the bill prays that "the de-
fendants may answer the premises as fully as if again thereto
especially interrogated, and may state particularly by what title,
or titles, or writings, they severally claim to be entitled to any
part of said estate, and may produce all and every such writ-
ings, or titles." The bill further prayed, that the lands might
be sold and a distribution made of the proceeds; and for further
relief.

Those of the defendants who did not disclaim all interest in



 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 1, Page 95   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives