clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 1, Page 75   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

GLENN VS. BAKER. 75

and as to whether this had been done in this case he said: "It
is not contended in this case, nor could it be, that there is any
direct evidence, that Childs at the date of the deed, intended
to make application for the benefit of the insolvent laws; but
it is said, that such intention may be established by facts and
circumstances as in other cases, and the case of Dulaney vs.
Hoffman, 7 Gill & Johns., 170, is referred to in support of the
proposition. There can be no doubt that such is the rule, and
the inquiry then is, whether the facts and circumstances of
this case are sufficiently strong to make out the intent.]

THE CHANCELLOR :

Now, whether the answer of Childs is or is not evidence
against the plaintiff, there can be no doubt that the burden of
proof is upon him, and that he can get no decree invalidating'
this deed, unless he can make out by satisfactory evidence, that
Childs, on the 4th December 1833, the date of its execution
intended to take the benefit of the insolvent laws; that such
was his view and expectation at that time.

Now, the first difficulty in the way of the plaintiff, and it
seems to me a formidable one, is, that Childs when he execu-
ted the deed by which the alleged preference was given, could
not apply for the benefit of the insolvent laws, for want of the
residence required, to bring him within their provisions. He
had then been living but a short time in Maryland, and many
months must elapse, before the relief contemplated by those laws
could be extended to him. How it may be asked can it be said
that he executed the deed with a view, and under an expecta-
tion of taking the benefit of laws, the provisions of which he
was in no condition to enjoy, because of the indispensable pre-
requisite of a two years residence which he did not possess,
It is true, (though he denies it in his answer,) he may have
known that special acts of insolvency were sometimes granted,
and that laws were occasionally passed, dispensing with some
of the conditions upon which the general system was admin-
istered; and he may have contemplated an application to the
legislature to dispense in his case, with the qualification of resi-



 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 1, Page 75   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives