clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 1, Page 416   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

416 HIGH COURT OF CHANCERY.

to be nrade by others. It is believed, however, that even if the
trustees had themselves offered to transfer, under circumstances
calculated to excite suspicion, that they were about to abuse
their trust, the bank would have been bound to institute the
necessary inquiry, and if it omitted to do so, and loss resulted,
the loss would be thrown upon it.

Such was the decision of the Circuit Court, and such is be-
lieved to be the law. There are, however, circumstances in
the ease referred to in the Circuit Court, which clearly distin-
guish it from this.

In that case, long after the period allowed by the law in this
state for the settlement of the estates of deceased persons, one
of the executors, his co-executor not concurring, transferred
the stock to another bank as security for the loan obtained by
him. This loan being repaid, the bank, from whom the execu-
tor borrowed the money, transferred the stock back to him, by
the name of the commercial firm under which he was trading,
by which name he subsequently transferred the same stock to
himself and his co-executor, as such; and then, shortly after-
wards, the same party signing his name as acting executor,
again transferred the stock to the same bank as security for
other sums borrowed by him for his own use, and these latter
loans not being paid by him, the stock was sold, and hence the
loss. These various acts, the Chief Justice said, all appearing
upon the books of the bank permitting the transfer, the purpose
for which the last transfer was made, could not be doubted by
the officers, familiar as they were with the usage of loaning
money upon the hypothecation of stock; and in truth, as stated
by the court, the bank, in its answer, impliedly admits such
knowledge by saying, "if the president had known that the
transfer was about to be made, he would have prevented it."

In this ease, there was but a single transfer, and that was
made by both the parties in whose names the stock stood, and
thtre is nothing in the answer of the city, or to be found in the
evidence, upon which any presumptions? can be raised, th-at the
officers of the city knew, or suspected that the parties nhakhtg
the transfer were abusing their trust.



 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 1, Page 416   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  November 18, 2025
Maryland State Archives