clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Brantly's annotated Bland's Reports, Chancery Court 1809-1832
Volume 198, Volume 3, Page 660   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

660 INDEX.—3 BLAND.

EXECUTORS AND ADMISTRATORS.— Continued.
See MONEY.
PARTITION.

FIXTURES.
See LIEN, 8

FRAUD.

See ABATEMENT.

GOVERNMENT.

1. All our governments are mere delegations of power for the benefit of

a sovereign people. Hepburn's Case, 78.

3. No unlimited discretionary power can be conferred on the judiciary
by the Legislature. Ib.

3. By virtue of the power of eminent domain, private property may be
taken for public uses; but private property cannot be taken from
one and given to another in any way. Ib.

4. The State may, as against itself admit the truth of any fact, or waive
the benefit of any rule of law. Ib.

5. The Legislature may by law, remove difficulties, or grant facilities,
as between individuals, without prejudice to private rights. Ib.

GUARDIAN AND WARD.
See LUNATIC, 7.

INFANT.

1. How far the Court has gone, upon general principles, or has been au-
thorized to go, by general or special legislative enactment, in ap-
plying the principal of an infant's estate to his maintenance and
education. Williams' Case, 200.

2. The Acts of Assembly which authorize the sale of real estates of
infants considered as to their true construction, their practical utility,
and their constitutionality. Ib.

See DEBTOR AND CREDITOR, 6, 8. 9.10, 15, 16.
SALE, 2.

INJUNCTION.

1. An injunction may be granted on an ex parte application on the bill
alone, notwithstanding an apparent misnomer of the defendant cor-
poration. Bosley v. Susquehanna Canal. 49.

2. An injunction granted before answer does not order the defendant to
do, or to undo any thing. Ib.

3. A motion to dissolve the injunction and exceptions to the answer
may be taken up together and determined at the same time. Sal
man v. Clagett, 106.

4. The difference between the combination of facts which gives rise to
the equity upon which the injunction rests, and that which gives
rise to the equity upon which the plaintiff asks relief. Ib.

5 How an injunction may be obtained; and how it may be dissolved
on bill and answer. Ib.

6. On a motion to dissolve, if the answer expressly denies all the facts
stated in the bill, or "such a material part of them as leaves not
enough to furnish an equitable foundation for the injunction it must
be dissolved. If, on the other hand, the defendant does not deny, or

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Brantly's annotated Bland's Reports, Chancery Court 1809-1832
Volume 198, Volume 3, Page 660   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives