clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Brantly's annotated Bland's Reports, Chancery Court 1809-1832
Volume 198, Volume 3, Page 576   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

576 NEALE v. HAGTHROP.-3 BLAND.

*his wife, was dead; and that, except the defendants Hughes
593 and Moore, none of the other defendants were in safe and
abundant pecuniary circumstances. Whereupon he prayed that a
receiver might be appointed, &c.

BLAND, C.,12th April, 1828.—Ordered, that the matter of this
petition be heard on the 20th day of May next. Provided, that a
copy of this order, together with a copy of the foregoing petition,
be served on each of the said defendants, except Samuel Moore
and George A. Hughes, on or before the 22d day of this month.
And either party is hereby authorized to take testimony before the
commissioners, in the City of Baltimore, to be read at the hearing,
on giving three days notice as usual.

The defendant Hagthrop on the first of May, 1828, answered
the application for a receiver, on oath, in which he admitted, that
he held the property in question; but denied, that he had received
the amount of rents and profits as charged by the plaintiff; and
said, that he believed he should be able to pay all his debts, pro-
vided he could obtain justice from those who withheld from him
his just rights, &c.

Under this last order some testimony was taken and filed on the
23d of May following, from which it appeared, that the defendant
Hagthrop was in straitened circumstances, and had himself ad-
mitted, that he was not worth a dollar. And that some of that
which the witness supposed to be the property in question was
occupied by worthless negroes.

After which the defendants, by their petition, stated that their
appeal had been dismissed by the Court of Appeals, on the 19th
of November, 1828, without costs, 1 G. & J. 308; and it had
therefore become necessary to take testimony to enable the audito:
to state an account as had been directed by this Court. Where-
upon they prayed, that a commission might be issued to the Balti-
more commissioners, &c.

BLAND, C., 20th November, 1828.—Ordered that the parties be
and they are hereby allowed to take testimony before the commis-
sioners appointed to take testimony in the City of Baltimore, in
relation to the accounts directed to be stated by the order of the
5th of December, 1826, on giving three days notice to the opposite
party, or his solicitor, as usual. Provided, that no testimony be
used before the auditor, or in any way admitted into this
594 *case, unless it be taken and filed with the register on or
before the first day of March next.

After which the plaintiff, by petition, renewed his application for
the appointment of a receiver and recommended Edward Pannell

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Brantly's annotated Bland's Reports, Chancery Court 1809-1832
Volume 198, Volume 3, Page 576   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives