clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Brantly's annotated Bland's Reports, Chancery Court 1809-1832
Volume 198, Volume 3, Page 403   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

McKIM v. ODOM.—3 BLAND. 403

pel the plaintiff to come into this Court, and incur the expense of
a bill of discovery. It certainly does seem to be reasonable, even
although the plaintiff should be ordered to pay the costs of this
Court in the first instance; yet that they should await the event of
the suit at law, and be taxed there like the costs for summoning
witnesses, &c. as a part of the costs of the suit at common law.
Cartwright v. Hately, 1 Ves. Jun. 292; Weymouth v. Boyer, I Ves.
Jun. 423; Simmonds v. Lord Kinnaird, 4 Ves. 746; Hindman v.
Taylor, 2 Bro. C. C. 10; Noble v. Garland, 1 Mad. Sep. 343; 1 Mad.
Pra. Chan. 216; Grant v. Jackson, Peake's Cas. N. P. 204.

The Act of Assembly declares, that in deciding on exceptions
to answers, the Court may award costs to the party prevailing;
1820, ch. 161, s. 8; by which the question of costs seems to have
been submitted entirely to the discretion of the Court, in all such
cases, without distinction. In the exercise of that discretion,
therefore, I cannot but think it as reasonable, on a mere bill of
discovery, as on a bill for relief, where the plaintiff has been put
to the expense and trouble of extracting a sufficient answer from
the defendant, or of pruning away its impertinences, that he should
have, at least the costs of the exceptions; and therefore I shall
give such costs in this case.

* Whereupon it is ordered, that the last one of the excep-
tions of the plaintiff to the said answer, be and the same is 407
hereby allowed; and that the said exhibit which the defendants
have prayed to be taken as a part of their answer, purporting to
be a copy of the second administration account of the defendants,
and the distribution of the surplus of their intestate's estate, be
expunged from the proceedings in this case; that all the other
exceptions of the said plaintiff to the said answer be overruled.
And that the defendants pay to the plaintiff all the costs of the
said exceptions, including a solicitor's fee, to be taxed by the
register.

McKIM v. ODOM.

HEARING ON BILL AND ANSWER.—CHANCERY PRACTICE.—EFFECT OF AN AP-
PEAL.—PUBLIC CORPORATIONS.

It the plaintiff brings on the case for hearing on bill and answer, he thereby

admits the answer to be true, (a)
The bill dismissed as to some of the defendants, and relief granted against

others.

A decree to account.
Where evidence is to be taken, a reasonable time to collect it is allowed as

of course.

(a) Cited in Warren v. Twilley, 10 Md. 48.

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Brantly's annotated Bland's Reports, Chancery Court 1809-1832
Volume 198, Volume 3, Page 403   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  November 18, 2025
Maryland State Archives