| Volume 198, Volume 3, Page 106 View pdf image (33K) |
|
106 SALMON v. CLAGETT.—3 BLAND. SALMON v. CLAGETT. *
INJUNCTIONS.—LAW AND PRACTICE OF.—MODES OF DEFENCE BY DEMURRER,
A single interrogatory propounded by the defendant to the plaintiff answered
A motion to dissolve the injunction and exceptions to the answer may be It is necessary in all doubtful cases to advert to the reason of the law.
The modes of defence by demurrer, by plea, by answer as called for by the
The demurrer takes the facts stated in the bill for true, and answers by
A plea usually admits or supposes all that is set forth in the bill to be true,
A plea demands the judgment of the Court in the first instance whether the
A plea or demurrer only supposes the facts to be true, but does not admit
A defendant who has omitted to answer, or answers evasively any substan- Matter in avoidance denied by the replication must be proved, (d)
A defendant who has omitted, or failed by demurrer or plea to protect him-
The modern cases allowing an answer in avoidance to subserve the purposes
The difference between the combination of facts which gives rise to the
How an injunction may be obtained: and how it may be dissolved on bill * Affirmed in 5 G. & J. 314. (a) See note {e} infra. (b) Cited in Rider v. Gray, 10 Md. 299.
(c) Cited in Hamilton v. Whitridge, 11 Md. 144: Keighler v. Savage Co. 12
(d) Cited in Cecil v. Cecil, 19 Md. 82.
|
||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Volume 198, Volume 3, Page 106 View pdf image (33K) |
|
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.