clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Brantly's annotated Bland's Reports, Chancery Court 1809-1832
Volume 198, Volume 3, Page 106   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

106 SALMON v. CLAGETT.—3 BLAND.

SALMON v. CLAGETT. *

INJUNCTIONS.—LAW AND PRACTICE OF.—MODES OF DEFENCE BY DEMURRER,
PLEA, OR ANSWER.—How AN INJUNCTION MAY BE OBTAINED AND HOW
DISSOLVED.—LIABILITY OF A PARTY OBTAINING ASSETS FROM A TRUS-
TEE.—DISCHARGE OF A SURETY BY ACT or CREDITOR.—FORECLOSURE OF
A MORTGAGE PAYABLE IN INSTALMENTS.

A single interrogatory propounded by the defendant to the plaintiff answered
by the monosyllable, "yes."

A motion to dissolve the injunction and exceptions to the answer may be
taken up together and determined at the same time, (a)

It is necessary in all doubtful cases to advert to the reason of the law.

The modes of defence by demurrer, by plea, by answer as called for by the
bill, by answer in avoidance, and by matter derived from the whole case
as shewn at the hearing considered and explained.

The demurrer takes the facts stated in the bill for true, and answers by
averring that they constitute no ground for relief. (b)

A plea usually admits or supposes all that is set forth in the bill to be true,
but states other facts which produce an equity which displaces that aris-
ing from the facts stated in the bill.

A plea demands the judgment of the Court in the first instance whether the
special matter urged by it does not debar the plaintiff from his right to
the answer required by the bill.

A plea or demurrer only supposes the facts to be true, but does not admit
them like an answer.

A defendant who has omitted to answer, or answers evasively any substan-
tial part of the bill, asks with ill grace for a dissolution of the injunc-
tion, (c)

Matter in avoidance denied by the replication must be proved, (d)

A defendant who has omitted, or failed by demurrer or plea to protect him-
self from making the discovery called for, must answer fully as the bill
requires.

The modern cases allowing an answer in avoidance to subserve the purposes
of a plea overruled.

The difference between the combination of facts which gives rise to the
equity upon which the injunction rests, and that which gives rise to the
equity upon which the plaintiff asks relief.

How an injunction may be obtained: and how it may be dissolved on bill
and answer.

* Affirmed in 5 G. & J. 314.

(a) See note {e} infra.

(b) Cited in Rider v. Gray, 10 Md. 299.

(c) Cited in Hamilton v. Whitridge, 11 Md. 144: Keighler v. Savage Co. 12
Md. 413; West v. Williams, 1 Md. Ch. 360. See Equity Rule, 28; Hopkins v.
Stump, 2 H. & J. 301, as to the rule that a defendant submitting to answer
must answer fully.

(d) Cited in Cecil v. Cecil, 19 Md. 82.

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Brantly's annotated Bland's Reports, Chancery Court 1809-1832
Volume 198, Volume 3, Page 106   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  November 18, 2025
Maryland State Archives