clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Brantly's annotated Bland's Reports, Chancery Court 1809-1832
Volume 198, Volume 2, Page 98   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

98 BINNEY'S CASE—2 BLAND.

therefore, to obtain a discharge from confinement, has a right to
have his case heard before any other matter now ready to be pre-
sented to the Court.

against the sheriff for not having the defendant's body in Court according
to the return of the writ.—Chancery Proceedings, Mb. P. L. fol. 12.

WALLACE v. BOTELER.—This was a bill filed on the 5th of August, 1797, to
foreclose a mortgage of real and personal estate.

HANSON, C., May, 1789.—Ordered, that the sheriff of Prince George's
County bring into Court the body of the defendant on the twenty-third day
of May instant, he being by the said sheriff returned "attached," to answer
in this case.

The defendant having failed to answer, and not having been brought into
Court, the case was again brought before the Court.

HANSON, C., 18th July, 1798.—The sheriff of Prince George's County
having failed to bring into Court the body of the defendant, agreeably to the
tenor of the order for that purpose passed, during the present term, and
regularly served upon him. It is thereupon adjudged and ordered, that
Notly Maddox, the sheriff aforesaid, be and he is hereby, on motion of the
complainant, amerced the sum of twenty pounds current money; unless he
shall bring into Court the body of the said defendant on the first day of next
October Term; provided that a copy of this order be served on the said
sheriff any time before the first day of September next.

After which, the defendant answered, and a decree was passed by consent
for a sale of the personal estate only, &c.

WATTS' CEEDITORS v. CAMPBELL, TRUSTEE.—KILTY, C., 8th July, 1808.—On
motion of the counsel of Winand, in whose behalf the order of which the
within is a copy was made: and it appearing by the affidavit, that the said
order was served, which was not obeyed. It is ordered, that the sheriff of
Charles County be amerced in the sum of £75; and the further sum of £10,
for a fine for the contempt and costs; unless he shall bring into this Court
the body of J. Campbell, trustee for the sale of the real estate of E. Watts,
deceased, being the same person mentioned in the order, of which the
within is a copy, on some day during the sitting of the Court, at September
Term next.

After which, on motion of the counsel for J. Winand, this matter was
again brought before the Court.

KILTY, C., 27th October, 1808.—Ordered, that the amercement in the order
of July 8th, 1808, be no longer continued; but be and the same is hereby ad-
judged to be final; the said sheriff T. A. Davis not having brought into Court
the body of J. Campbell therein mentioned, according to the tenor of the
said order—and it is further ordered, that the said sheriff T. A. Davis pay to
the said J. Winand, on or before the 15th of November next the said amerce-
ment, being £75 and costs: and do also pay the fine for contempt, being £10.

An affidavit of the service of this order was made on the 25th November,
1808; and Winand by his petition filed on the 3d December, 1808, prayed for
a ca. sa.

KILTY, C., 2d December, 1808.—Let a ca. sa. issue as prayed to the coroner
of Charles County, returnable to the first day of the ensuing term.

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Brantly's annotated Bland's Reports, Chancery Court 1809-1832
Volume 198, Volume 2, Page 98   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives