TOWNSHEND v. DUNCAN.— 2 BLAND. 79

to since the Revolntion; The State v. Brooke, ante, 42, note; (t)
and the Court has gone so far as to compel a witness to submit

which is certified by us, the subscribers, this 38th day of January, 1747.
George Plater. Abraham Barnes, James Mills."

OGLE, C., May, 1748.—Decreed, that the said George Gordon, executor of
the said George Forbes, one of the defendants, pay to the complainant 61,500
Ibs. of tobacco out of the goods and chattels, which were of the said George
Forbes, in his hands to be administered; and that the complainant recover
the same accordingly. And that Dryden Forbes, one other of the defend-
ants, pay unto the complainant such part of the quantity of 23,000 lbs. of
tobacco, as was received by the said Henry P. Jowles, her former husband,
in his life-time, out of the goods and chattels which were of the said Henry
P. Jowles, remaining in her hands to be administered, if so much she hath;
and such part thereof as was received by the said John Forbes, her second
husband, out of the goods and chattels which were of the said John Forbes,
in her hands to be administered, if so much she hath; and the residue of the
said 23,000 lbs. of tobacco, which she received after the death of the said
Henry P. Jowles, and before her intermarriage with the said John Forbes;
and so much thereof as she received since the death of the said John Forbes,
out of her own proper goods and chattels, and that the complainant recover
the same accordingly. And that the other defendant Ann Greenfleld, pay
unto the complainant so much of the 31.000 lbs. of tobacco, mentioned in the
said return, as was received by the said Thomas T. Greenfield, her testator,
out of his goods and chattels remaining in her hands to be administered, if
so much she hath; and the residue of the said 31.000 lbs. of tobacco, which
she received since the death of her said testator, out of her own proper goods
and chattels, and that the complainant recover the same accordingly. And
it is further Decreed, that the complainant recover all Ms costs in this cause
against the defendants out of the goods and chattels of their respective tes-
tators in their hands to be administered, if so much they have; if not, that
the complainant recover one-third part of the said costs of the proper goods
and chattels of the said Dryden Forbes, and one-third part thereof of the
proper goods and chattels of the said Ann Greenfield."—Chancery Proceed-
ings, lib. J. R. No. 5,fol. 339 to 371.

BARNEY v. HOLLINS.—KILTY, C., 4th January, 1810.—Decreed, that the
parties account with each other concerning the partnership transactions of
the said parties, under the firm of Barney and Hollins in the proceedings
mentioned. That the auditor of this Court state the account relative thereto,
on the evidence in the cause, and such other evidence as the parties may pro-
duce to him, on notice as usual in such cases. The said account to be re-
turned to this Court for further order, and subject to the exceptions of either
party. The Chancellor has to remark, that the taking of further evidence by
the auditor, after the decree to account, appeared to be the practice; and has
so continued since his coming into office. MS.

(t) COCKEY v. CHAPMAN, 10th February, 1729.—Injunction bill; answer
filed; motion to dissolve the injunction this Court; ruled motion to dissolve
the injunction 31st February; on motion of the defendant's counsel, and
hearing what was alleged by the counsel of both sides, ruled that injunction
be dissolved.

After which, the plaintiff by his petition stated, that his injunction had
been dissolved, as he understood, upon the ground, that he had not paid